FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375  
376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   >>   >|  
onsent of Congress should be given to the said stipulations before the same can have full force and effect." There was no mention of the Senate's ratification, merely a reference to the fact that "the President has entered into a treaty with the Emperor of Russia, and has agreed to pay him the sum of seven million two hundred thousand dollars in coin." The House by this preamble evidently claimed that its consent to the treaty was just as essential as the consent of the Senate,--that it was, in short, a subject for the consideration of Congress. The Senate was unwilling to admit such a pretension, especially when put forth by the House in this bald form, and therefore rejected it unanimously. The matter was sent to a conference, and by changing the preamble a compromise was promptly effected, which preserved the rank and dignity of both branches. It declared that "whereas the President had entered into a treaty with the Emperor of Russia, and _the Senate thereafter gave its advice and consent to said treaty, . . . and whereas said stipulations cannot be carried into full force and effect, except by legislation to which the consent of both Houses of Congress is necessary;_ therefore be it enacted that there be appropriated the sum of $7,200,000" for the purpose named. With this compromise the bill was readily passed, and became a law by the President's approval July 27, 1868. The preamble finally agreed upon, though falling far short of the one first adopted by the House, was yet regarded as a victory for that branch. The issue between the Senate and the House, now adjusted by a compromise, is an old one, agitated at different periods ever since the controversy over the Jay treaty in 1794-95. It is simply whether the House is bound to vote for an appropriation to carry out a treaty Constitutionally made by the President and the Senate, without judging for itself whether, on the merits of the treaty, the appropriation should be made. After the appropriation required under the Jay treaty had been voted by the House, that body declared in a resolution which was adopted by _ayes_ 57, _noes_ 35, "that it is the Constitutional right and duty of the House of Representatives, in all such cases, to deliberate on the expediency or inexpediency of carrying such treaty into effect, and to determine and act thereon as in their judgment may be most conducive to the public good." But that was the declaration of the House o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375  
376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

treaty

 

Senate

 
consent
 

President

 

preamble

 

Congress

 
compromise
 
effect
 

appropriation

 

declared


entered
 
Emperor
 
adopted
 

Russia

 

agreed

 

stipulations

 
simply
 

falling

 

regarded

 

branch


adjusted

 

periods

 

agitated

 

controversy

 

victory

 

carrying

 

determine

 

thereon

 

inexpediency

 

deliberate


expediency

 

judgment

 

declaration

 

public

 

conducive

 
Representatives
 
required
 

merits

 

Constitutionally

 

judging


Constitutional
 
resolution
 

essential

 

subject

 

claimed

 

evidently

 
thousand
 

dollars

 
consideration
 

unwilling