el."
His mind, as will appear, was essentially of the strictly practical
cast. He no doubt believed with Macaulay that "one acre in Middlesex
is worth a principality in Utopia."
That the Republican simplicity of the new Judge followed him from his
"very humble and obscure law-office" to the Bench, will now appear:
"The very first court I held was in Washington County, and it was to
me a strange and novel business. I was amongst old comrades
with whom I had been raised, ranged in the war with them, and lived
with them in great intimacy and equality, so that it was difficult
to assume a different relationship than I had previously occupied with
them. Moreover I detested a mock dignity. Both the sheriff and
clerk were rangers in the same company with myself, and it seemed we
were still ranging on equal terms in pursuit of the Indians.
The sheriff was of the same opinion and very familiar. He opened court
sitting astride on a bench in the Court-house, and without rising,
proclaimed: 'The court is now open, and our John is on the bench.'"
It may here be mentioned that the first case of importance that
came before Judge Reynolds, was the trial of one William Bennett
for murder. He had killed his antagonist in a duel in St. Clair
County, for which he suffered the death penalty. This is the only
duel ever fought in Illinois. No doubt the prompt execution of
Bennett did much to discourage duelling in the State.
In reply to the charge that he had acted with unbecoming levity
upon the trial of Bennett, the Judge said, "No human being of my
humble capacity could have acted with more painful feelings and
sympathy than did I on this occasion." Having thus vindicated
himself from the serious charge mentioned, he adds:
"I am opposed to capital punishment in any case where the convict can
be kept in solitary confinement without pardoning his life; it was
extremely painful and awful to me to be the instrument in the hands
of the law to pronounce sentence of death upon my fellow-man,
extinguishing him forever from the face of the earth, and depriving
him of life, which I think belongs to God and not to man."
He consoles himself, however, as he closes his narrative of this
sad affair, that "it never did assume the character of a regular
and honorable duel." It is very satisfactory also, even at this
distant date, to be assured by the Judge that "the prisoner embraced
religion, was baptized, and died happy, before
|