ns along with the Latin, which were at that time
used in the Lutheran Church. These, Luther for sometime himself
defended, as it is certain he did the elevation of the host, (but not
for adoration,) till 1542, more than _twenty years_ after he commenced
the Reformation. Those who object to these statements confound the
teachings of the Confession with the _subsequent practice of Luther and
the churches_; yea, it has appeared to us, in the course of our recent
examinations on these subjects, that the Augsburg Confession was not
even up to the progress of reform attained by churches at that day, and
this may be one reason why Luther told Melancthon he had yielded too
much to the Papists in the Confession. In our Lutheran Manual, we have
simply presented the article of the Confession in full, in
juxtaposition with the Smalcald Article, treating of the same subject;
and have done so without note or comment, except the remark, that the
latter refutes the tolerant views of the mass expressed in the former.
We can, therefore, see no inconsistency between what we have published
on this subject at distant intervals, certainly much less than might
have occurred to the most careful and conscientious writer, on a
subject so closely connected with the fluctuations of language.
Doubtless, by taking detached portions of a paragraph apart from the
limitations connected with them, and falsely imputing sinister motives
to almost every sentence, it in possible to make the most correct author
contradict himself and misrepresent his subject; but with such men,
whether their misrepresentations arise from deliberate design or
inveterate general habit, we cannot consent to debate. The injury done
is rather to the cause of Christ and of truth than ourselves, and we can
well afford to commit the case for adjudication to that Omniscient
Being, "who judgeth righteously."
Note 1. See Luther's Works, Leipsic ed., Vol. xxi, pp. 447, 448.
Note 2. See Luther's letter to Prince George in his Works, Vol. xxi.,
p. 430.
Note 3. Vol. iii., p. 114.
Note 4. See Murdock, Edition of Moshiem's History, Vol. iii, page 53,
Harper's edition.
Note 5. Fuhrmann's Lexicon, Vol. iii., p. 3.
Note 6. Siegel's Manual, Vol. iii., p. 362.
Note 7. Ibid, p. 366.
Note 8. Ibid, p. 375.
Note 9. Luther's Works, Vol. xxii., p. 233-37.
Note 10. Ibid, p. 237.
Note 11. Ibid, p. 240.
Note 12. Ibid. p. 338.
Note 13. Luther's Works, Vol. xix., p. 666.
No
|