FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   >>   >|  
uted for the latter period. In the course of the debate, which followed, Mr. Hubbard said, that he had voted against the abolition, when the year 1793 was proposed; but he thought that, if it were not to take place till 1795, sufficient time would be allowed the planters. He would support this amendment; and he congratulated the House on the prospect of the final triumph of truth, humanity, and justice. Mr. Addington preferred the year 1796 to the year 1795. Mr. Alderman Watson considered the abolition in 1796 to be as destructive as if it were immediate. A division having taken place, the number of votes in favour of the original motion were one hundred and sixty-one, and in favour of Lord Mornington's amendment for the year 1795, one hundred and twenty-one. Sir Edward Knatchbull, however, seeing that there was a disposition in the House to bring the matter to a conclusion, and that a middle line would be preferred, moved that the year 1796 should be substituted for the year 1800. Upon this the House divided again; when there appeared for the original motion only one hundred and thirty-two, but for the amendment one hundred and fifty-one. The gradual abolition having been now finally agreed upon for the year 1796, a committee was named, which carried the resolution to the Lords. On the eighth of May, the Lords were summoned to consider it. Lord Stormont, after having spoken for some time, moved, that they should hear evidence upon it. Lord Grenville opposed the motion on account of the delay, which would arise from an examination of the witnesses by the House at large: but he moved that such witnesses should be examined by a committee of the House. Upon this a debate ensued, and afterwards a division; when the original motion was carried by sixty-three against thirty-six. On the 15th of May the Lords met again. Evidence was then ordered to be summoned in behalf of those interested in the continuance of the trade. At length it was introduced; but on the fifth of June, when only seven persons had been examined, a motion was made and carried, that the farther examinations should be postponed to the next session. CHAPTER V. _Continuation from July 1792 to July 1793--Author travels round the kingdom again--Motion to renew the resolution of the last year in the Commons--Motion lost--New Motion in the Commons to abolish the foreign Slave-trade--Motion lost--Proceedings of the Lords._ The resolut
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232  
233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 

Motion

 

hundred

 

amendment

 

abolition

 

original

 
carried
 
examined
 

thirty

 

witnesses


favour

 

division

 

preferred

 

resolution

 

Commons

 

summoned

 

debate

 

committee

 

ensued

 
evidence

examination

 

opposed

 

account

 

Grenville

 

Author

 

travels

 

Continuation

 

session

 
CHAPTER
 

kingdom


Proceedings

 

resolut

 

foreign

 

abolish

 

postponed

 
examinations
 

behalf

 

interested

 

ordered

 

Evidence


continuance

 
persons
 

farther

 

length

 

introduced

 

spoken

 
prospect
 

triumph

 

congratulated

 
support