FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
s_ authority follows Freeman in wishing to eject the word "ovation" from the language; surely a ridiculous literalism. It is true we do not sacrifice a sheep at a modern "ovation," but neither (for example) do we judge by the flight of birds when we declare the circumstances to be "auspicious" for such and such an undertaking. Again, we are never to "retire" for the night, but always to "go to bed." If, as is commonly alleged, Americans say "retire" because they consider it indelicate to go to bed, the feeling and the expression are alike foolish. But I do not believe that either is at all common in America. On the other hand, one may retire for the night without going to bed. In the case of ladies especially, the interval between retiring and going to bed is reputed to be far from inconsiderable. If, then, one really means "retired for the night" and does _not_ definitely mean "went to bed," I see no crime in employing the expression that conveys one's exact meaning. Finally the _New York Press_ will not let us use the word "commence;" we must always "begin." This is an excellent example of unreflecting or half-reflecting purism. "Commence" is a very old word; it is used by the best writers; it is easily pronounceable and not in the least grandiloquent; indeed it has precisely the length and cadence of its competitor. But somebody or other one day observed that it was Latin, whereas "begin" was Saxon; and since then there has been a systematic attempt, in several quarters, to hound the innocent and useful synonym out of the language. Whence comes this rage for impoverishing our tongue! The more synonyms we possess the better. Wherefore (by the way) I for my part should not be too rigorous in excluding a forcible Americanism merely because it happens to duplicate some word or expression already current in England. The rich language is that which possesses not only the necessaries of life but also an abundance of superfluities. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote U: Mr. Andrew Lang says: "Plenty of other words are formed on the same analogy: the Greeks, in the verb 'to Medize,' set the example. But we happen to have no use for 'scientist.'" It is not quite clear whether Mr. Lang employs "have no use" in the American sense, expressing sheer dislike, or in the literal and English sense. In the latter case I can only say that he has been fortunate in never coming across conjunctures in which "man of science" came in awkwardly and i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:
language
 

retire

 

expression

 
ovation
 

duplicate

 

rigorous

 

Wherefore

 

excluding

 

forcible

 

Americanism


attempt

 
quarters
 

innocent

 
systematic
 
synonym
 

tongue

 

synonyms

 

possess

 

impoverishing

 

Whence


Andrew

 

American

 

expressing

 

employs

 

awkwardly

 
dislike
 

literal

 

fortunate

 

coming

 

conjunctures


science

 

English

 
scientist
 

happen

 

abundance

 

superfluities

 

FOOTNOTES

 

Footnote

 

England

 

possesses


necessaries
 
Greeks
 

Medize

 

analogy

 

Plenty

 
formed
 

current

 
excellent
 
foolish
 

feeling