FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3025   3026   3027   3028   3029   3030   3031   3032   3033   3034   3035   3036   3037   3038   3039   3040   3041   3042   3043   3044   3045   3046   3047   3048   3049  
3050   3051   3052   3053   3054   3055   3056   3057   3058   3059   3060   3061   3062   3063   3064   3065   3066   3067   3068   3069   3070   3071   3072   3073   3074   >>   >|  
blame; for the Publisher will publish what is set before him. It is true that if he published no books on commission he would deserve the praise of the State, but it is quite unreasonable for us to expect him to deserve the praise of the State, since it is we who supply him with these books and incite him to publish them. We cannot, therefore, lay the blame on the Publisher. We must lay the blame where it clearly should be laid, on ourselves. We ourselves create the demand for bad and false fiction. Very many of us have private means; for such there is no excuse. Very many of us have none; for such, once started on this journey of fiction, there is much, often tragic, excuse--the less reason then for not having trained ourselves before setting out on our way. There is no getting out of it; the fault is ours. If we will not put ourselves to school when we are young; if we must rush into print before we can spell; if we will not repress our natural desires and walk before we run; if we will not learn at least what not to do--we shall go on wandering through the forest, singing our foolish songs. And since we cannot train ourselves except by writing, let us write, and burn what we write; then shall we soon stop writing, or produce what we need not burn! For, as things are now, without compass, without map, we set out into the twilight forest of fiction; without path, without track--and we never emerge. Yes, with the French writer, we must say: "Et nous jongleurs inutiles, frivoles joueurs de luth!" . . . 1906. REFLECTIONS ON OUR DISLIKE OF THINGS AS THEY ARE Yes! Why is this the chief characteristic of our art? What secret instincts are responsible for this inveterate distaste? But, first, is it true that we have it? To stand still and look at a thing for the joy of looking, without reference to any material advantage, and personal benefit, either to ourselves or our neighbours, just simply to indulge our curiosity! Is that a British habit? I think not. If, on some November afternoon, we walk into Kensington Gardens, where they join the Park on the Bayswater side, and, crossing in front of the ornamental fountain, glance at the semicircular seat let into a dismal little Temple of the Sun, we shall see a half-moon of apathetic figures. There, enjoying a moment of lugubrious idleness, may be sitting an old countrywoman with steady eyes in a lean, dusty-black dress and an old poke-bonn
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3025   3026   3027   3028   3029   3030   3031   3032   3033   3034   3035   3036   3037   3038   3039   3040   3041   3042   3043   3044   3045   3046   3047   3048   3049  
3050   3051   3052   3053   3054   3055   3056   3057   3058   3059   3060   3061   3062   3063   3064   3065   3066   3067   3068   3069   3070   3071   3072   3073   3074   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
fiction
 

excuse

 

forest

 

writing

 
Publisher
 

publish

 

deserve

 

praise

 

curiosity

 
reference

advantage

 
simply
 

neighbours

 

benefit

 

personal

 

material

 
indulge
 
THINGS
 

DISLIKE

 
characteristic

distaste

 

inveterate

 

secret

 

instincts

 
responsible
 

enjoying

 

moment

 

lugubrious

 

idleness

 

figures


apathetic

 

sitting

 

countrywoman

 

steady

 

Temple

 

Kensington

 
Gardens
 

afternoon

 

November

 

REFLECTIONS


Bayswater

 

glance

 

semicircular

 

dismal

 

fountain

 
ornamental
 

crossing

 
British
 

jongleurs

 

expect