FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  
nter in the Shakespeare-Bacon problem. He had long been unable to believe that the actor-manager from Stratford had written those great plays, and now a book just published, 'The Shakespeare Problem Restated', by George Greenwood, and another one in press, 'Some Characteristic Signatures of Francis Bacon', by William Stone Booth, had added the last touch of conviction that Francis Bacon, and Bacon only, had written the Shakespeare dramas. I was ardently opposed to this idea. The romance of the boy, Will Shakespeare, who had come up to London and began, by holding horses outside of the theater, and ended by winning the proudest place in the world of letters, was something I did not wish to let perish. I produced all the stock testimony--Ben Jonson's sonnet, the internal evidence of the plays themselves, the actors who had published them--but he refused to accept any of it. He declared that there was not a single proof to show that Shakespeare had written one of them. "Is there any evidence that he didn't?" I asked. "There's evidence that he couldn't," he said. "It required a man with the fullest legal equipment to have written them. When you have read Greenwood's book you will see how untenable is any argument for Shakespeare's authorship." I was willing to concede something, and offered a compromise. "Perhaps," I said, "Shakespeare was the Belasoo of that day--the managerial genius, unable to write plays himself, but with the supreme gift of making effective drama from the plays of others. In that case it is not unlikely that the plays would be known as Shakespeare's. Even in this day John Luther Long's 'Madam Butterfly' is sometimes called Belasco's play; though it is doubtful if Belasco ever wrote a line of it." He considered this view, but not very favorably. The Booth book was at this time a secret, and he had not told me anything concerning it; but he had it in his mind when he said, with an air of the greatest conviction: "I know that Shakespeare did not write those plays, and I have reason to believe he did not touch the text in any way." "How can you be so positive?" I asked. He replied: "I have private knowledge from a source that cannot be questioned." I now suspected that he was joking, and asked if he had been consulting a spiritual medium; but he was clearly in earnest. "It is the great discovery of the age," he said, quite seriously. "The world will soon ring with it. I wish I could
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 

written

 

evidence

 

conviction

 

Belasco

 

Francis

 
Greenwood
 

published

 

unable

 
doubtful

called

 

managerial

 

genius

 

supreme

 
Butterfly
 

effective

 
Luther
 

making

 

source

 

questioned


suspected
 

joking

 

knowledge

 

private

 

positive

 
replied
 

consulting

 

spiritual

 

medium

 

earnest


discovery

 

secret

 

favorably

 

considered

 

greatest

 
reason
 

Belasoo

 
romance
 

dramas

 

ardently


opposed

 
London
 

winning

 

proudest

 

theater

 

holding

 
horses
 

Stratford

 
Problem
 
manager