l mondo lerci." Many
belonging to the past are notorious; and no good could come of
mentioning the names of the living.
[3] This accusation against men who feel a sexual inclination for males
loses some of its significance when we consider how common the practice
of _Venus aversa_ is among libertines who love women. Parent-Duchatelet
asserts that no prostitute after a certain age has escaped it.
Coffignon, in his book on, "La Corruption a Paris" (p. 324), says:
"Chaque annee, il passe en traitement a l'hopital de Lourcine une
centaine de femmes sodomistes.... Je suis persuade qu'a l'hopital de St.
Lazare la proportion des sodomistes est encore beaucoup plus grande....
Les maitresses de maison, professant cet odieux principe que la
clientele doit etre satisfaite, ne permettent pas a une fille de se
refuser a une acte de sodomie." Tardieu (Attentats, &c., p. 198)
observes: "Chose singuliere! c'est principalement des rapports conjugaux
que se sont produits les faits de cette nature."
[4] See Casper-Liman, vol. i., p. 182, at the end of Case 71.
[5] While studying what Germans call the _Casuistik_ of this question in
medical, forensic, and anthropological works, we often meet with cases
where inverted sexuality exhibits extraordinary symptoms of apparent
craziness--strange partialities for particular kinds of dress,
occupations in the beloved object, nastinesses, and so forth. But it
must be remarked first that the same symptoms are exhibited by sexually
normal natures (Krafft-Ebing, Observations 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, and the cases recorded in footnote to page 90);
and, secondly, that if they should appear to be more frequent in the
abnormal, this can in a great measure be ascribed to the fact that these
latter cases only come under the observation of medical men and judges
when the patients have already for many years been suffering from all
the pangs of a coerced and defrauded instinct. There is nothing in the
copious history of Greece and Rome upon this subject to lead us to
suppose that in a society which tolerated sexual inversion, its subjects
were more conspicuous for filthy and degrading or insane proclivities
than ordinary men and women were. Those who can bring themselves to
enquire into such matters may convince themselves by reading Forberg's
annotations to "Hermaphroditus," Rosenbaum's "Lustseuche," the
pseudo-Meursius, and the pornographical dialogues of Aretino. It will
app
|