FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297  
298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   >>   >|  
e: The Arguments of the Romanists--1. Luther a Heretic and a Fool] The first, and by far the strongest, is, that he calls me names--a heretic, a blind, senseless fool, one possessed by the devil, a serpent, a poisonous reptile, and many other names of similar import; not simply once, but throughout the book, almost on every page.[15] Such reproaches, slanders and calumnies are of no account in other books. But when a book is made at Leipzig, and issued from the cloister of the bare-foot friars, by a Romanist of the high and holy observance[16] of St. Frauds, such names are not merely fine examples of mediation, but likewise strong arguments with which to defend papal power, indulgences, Scripture, faith and the Church.[17] It is not necessary that any one of these should be proved by Scripture or by reason; it is quite enough that they have been put down in his book by a Romanist and holy observant of the order of St. Francis. And inasmuch as this Romanist himself writes that the Jews had overcome Christ on the cross with such arguments, I, too, must surrender, and acknowledge that as far as cursing and scolding, abuse and slander are concerned, the Romanist has surely beaten Dr. Luther. On this point he doubtless wins. [Sidenote: The Argument from Reason] The second argument, to express it tersely, is that of natural reason. This is the argument: A. Every community[18] on earth, if it is not to fall to pieces, must have a bodily head, under the true head, which is Christ. B. Inasmuch as all Christendom is one community on earth, it must have a head, which is the pope. [Sidenote: The Futility of the Argument] This argument I have designated with the letters A and B for the sake of clearness, and also to show that this Romanist has learned his A-B-C all the way down to B. However, to answer this argument: Since the question is whether the pope's power is by divine right, is it not a bit ridiculous that human reason (that ability which is drawn from experience in temporal things) is brought in and placed on a level with the divine law, especially since it is the intention of this poor presumptuous mortal to bring the divine law against me. For the teachings of human experience and reason are far below the divine law. The Scriptures expressly forbid us to follow our own reason, Deuteronomy xii, "Ye shall not do...every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes" [Deut. 12:8]; for human reason ever strives
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297  
298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

reason

 

Romanist

 

divine

 

argument

 
Sidenote
 

Luther

 

arguments

 

Scripture

 
experience
 

Christ


Argument
 
community
 

Futility

 

designated

 

Christendom

 

express

 

letters

 

doubtless

 

Inasmuch

 

tersely


pieces
 

strives

 

Reason

 

natural

 

bodily

 

teachings

 
intention
 
presumptuous
 

mortal

 
Scriptures

expressly

 

whatsoever

 
Deuteronomy
 

forbid

 

follow

 
However
 
answer
 

question

 

learned

 

things


brought

 

temporal

 

beaten

 
ridiculous
 

ability

 
clearness
 

slanders

 

calumnies

 

account

 
reproaches