FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  
n his objection; but I admit it only as a _presumption_--against which there is a decided preponderance of material facts. In the first place, there are the oldest names of the geographical localities throughout Spain. These, as shown by the well-known monograph of Humboldt, are _not_ Celtic, and are _Iberic_. In the next place, the Celtic frontier was by no means so near the geographical boundary of the Peninsula as it is often supposed to have been. Instead of the Celtic of Gaul reaching the Pyrenees, the Iberic of Spain reached the Loire--so that the province of Aquitania, although Gallic in politics, was Iberic in ethnology. This, again, is shown by Humboldt. For my own part, instead of discussing the relation of the Celts of Celtiberia to the other inhabitants of Spain, I would open a new question, and investigate the grounds upon which we believe in an intermixture at all. Whatever respect we may pay to the statements of the classical writers, the _name_ itself is not conclusive; since it would be just as likely to be given from an approach on the part of an Iberic population to the Celtic manners, or from the adoption of any _supposed_ Celtic characteristic, as from absolute ethnological intermixture. Like modern observers, the ancient writers were too fond of gratuitously assuming an intermixture of blood for the explanation of the results of common physical or social conditions. Hence--without pressing my opinion on the reader--I confine myself to an expression of doubt as to the existence of Celts amongst the Celtiberi _at all_. But this only simplifies the question as to the ethnological position of the Iberic variety of the human species. It does not even suggest an answer. They were the aborigines of Spain. They are the ancestors of the present Biscayans. Their tongue survives in the north-west provinces of Spain, and in the north-east corner of France. It _has no recognized affinity with any known tongue; and it has undeniable points of contrast with all the languages of the countries around._ Yet it is only by means of the Basque language that the problem can be attempted. The physical conformation of the still extant Iberians, has nothing definitely characteristic about it. The ancient mythology has died away. The tribes most immediately allied have ceased to be other than unmixed. So the language alone remains--and that has yet to find its interpreter. An Iberic basis--Greek, Ph[oe]nician,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Iberic

 

Celtic

 
intermixture
 
characteristic
 
language
 

supposed

 

ethnological

 

Humboldt

 

writers

 

question


physical

 

geographical

 

ancient

 

tongue

 

aborigines

 
ancestors
 

nician

 
survives
 

Biscayans

 
present

position

 

expression

 
existence
 

confine

 

reader

 

pressing

 

opinion

 

Celtiberi

 

species

 

suggest


variety

 
simplifies
 

answer

 

points

 

immediately

 

tribes

 

mythology

 

allied

 

ceased

 

interpreter


remains

 

unmixed

 

affinity

 

undeniable

 

contrast

 

languages

 
recognized
 
provinces
 
corner
 

France