FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
d Celticists who have any literary gift and any appreciation of evidence is decisive on this point--not only are the most characteristic unifying features--the Graal story and the love of Lancelot and Guinevere--completely wanting, but _the_ great stroke of genius--the connection of these two and the subordination of all minor legends as to the dim national hero, Arthur, with those about him--is more conspicuously wanting still. Whether it was the Englishman Walter Map, the Norman Robert de Borron, or the Frenchman Chrestien de Troyes, to whom this flash of illumination came, has never been proved--will pretty certainly now never be proved. M. Gaston Paris failed to do it; and it is exceedingly unlikely that, where he failed, any one else will succeed, unless the thrice and thirty times sifted libraries of Europe yield some quite unexpected windfall. In the works commonly attributed to Chrestien, all of which are well known to the present writer, there is no sign of his having been able to conceive this, though he is a delightful romancer. Robert is a mere shadow; and his attributed works, _as_ his works, are shadows too, though they are interesting enough in themselves. Walter not only has the greatest amount of traditional attribution, but is the undoubted author of _De Nugis Curialium_. And the author of _De Nugis Curialium_, different as it is from the Arthurian story, _could_ have finally divined the latter. But at the time when he wrote, Englishmen, with the rarest exceptions, wrote only in French or Latin; and when they began to write in English, a man of genius, to interpret and improve on him, was not found for a long time. And the most interesting parts of the Arthurian story are rarely handled at all in such early vernacular versions of it as we have, whether in verse or prose. Naturally enough, perhaps, it was the fabulous historic connection with British history, and the story of the great British enchanter Merlin, that attracted most attention. The _Arthour and Merlin_ which is in the Auchinleck MS.; the prose _Merlin_, published by the Early English Text Society; the alliterative Thornton _Morte d'Arthur_, and others, are wont to busy themselves about the antecedents of the real story--about the uninteresting wars of the King himself with Saxons, and Romans, and giants, and rival kings, rather than with the great chivalric triple cord of Round Table, Graal, and Guinevere's fault. The pure Graal poems, _Jo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Merlin

 

Robert

 

Walter

 

proved

 

British

 

failed

 
English
 
Chrestien
 

Arthur

 
attributed

Guinevere
 

wanting

 
Curialium
 

interesting

 

Arthurian

 

connection

 
genius
 
author
 

improve

 

rarely


handled

 
vernacular
 

French

 

exceptions

 
Englishmen
 

rarest

 

versions

 
finally
 
divined
 

interpret


Auchinleck

 

Romans

 

giants

 

Saxons

 

uninteresting

 

chivalric

 

triple

 

antecedents

 

history

 

enchanter


attracted

 

attention

 

historic

 

fabulous

 

Naturally

 
Arthour
 
Thornton
 

alliterative

 
Society
 

published