FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   >>   >|  
lows ([Greek: phusa]), and not the usual verb [Greek: aulein], to play the aulos. Another instrument, mentioned by Aristophanes in _Lysistrata_ (ll. 1242 and 1245), which was probably a kind of bag-pipe, is also derived from [Greek: phusa], _i.e._ _physallis_, the "concrete,"[28] and _physateria_[29] the "collective"[28] form of the instrument. We leave the realm of inference for that of certainty when we reach the reign of Nero, who had a passion for the _Hydraulus_ (see ORGAN: _History_) and the _tibia utricularis_.[30] That the bag-pipe was introduced by the Romans into the British Isles is a conclusion supported by the discovery in the foundations of the praetorian camp at Richborough of a small bronze figure of a Roman soldier playing the tibia utricularis. The Rev. Stephen Weston, who made a communication on the subject to _Archaeologia_,[31] points out further the interesting fact in connexion with the instrument, that the Romans had instituted colleges for training pipers on the bag-pipe, a practice followed in the Highlands in the 18th century and notably in Skye. Gruterus[32] mentions among the fraternities a _Corpus et Collegium Utriculariorum_, and Spon[33] also quotes the _Collegio Utricular_. The bag-pipe in question appears to have two drones in front pointing towards the right shoulder, and although no chaunter is shown in the design, both hands are held in correct positions over the spot where it ought to be; it may have been broken off. The bronze figure has been reproduced from drawings by Edward King in three positions.[34] The statement made by several writers on music that a bag-pipe is represented on a contorniate of Nero is erroneous, as a verification of certain references will show.[35] The error is due in the first place to [v.03 p.0206] Montfaucon, who misunderstood the explanation of Bianchini's drawing which he reproduced. The contorniate referred to is one containing the hydraulic organ, and the legend _Laurentinus Aug_., but no bag-pipe. Bianchini gives a drawing of a bag-pipe with two long drones, which, he says, was copied from a marble relief over the gateway of the palace of the prince of Santa Croce in Rome, near the church of San Carlo ad Catinarios. If the drawing be accurate and the sculpture of classical Roman period, it would corroborate the details of the instrument held by the little bronze figure of the Roman soldier. From England the bag-pipe spread to Caledonia and Ireland,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

instrument

 

drawing

 

bronze

 

figure

 

Bianchini

 

utricularis

 

Romans

 

positions

 
reproduced
 

contorniate


drones
 

soldier

 

statement

 
Edward
 

period

 
drawings
 
writers
 

verification

 

references

 

erroneous


sculpture

 

broken

 
represented
 

classical

 
design
 

spread

 

Caledonia

 

Ireland

 
chaunter
 

England


details

 

corroborate

 

accurate

 

correct

 

hydraulic

 

legend

 

Laurentinus

 

shoulder

 
referred
 
prince

gateway

 

relief

 

copied

 

palace

 

Catinarios

 

marble

 

misunderstood

 

explanation

 

church

 

Montfaucon