FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273  
274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   >>   >|  
If I do, you must check me. Again I say, I thank Virginia for her invitation. Why should we not confer together? Six or seven States--no matter which--are gone. If nothing is done, eight or nine others will follow, and other divisions will come as a matter of necessity. Rhode Island--patriotic Rhode Island--will not go with New England in this Conference. She will not separate from her southern sisters. Connecticut, I think, will not stay, and New York, I believe, will stand with the South. How is it, or why is it, that we should do nothing? Why should we break up and go home? Have not all the States asked us to come here and do this work? Why did their legislatures take the trouble to send us here? All this circumlocution might have better been done at home. Will a Convention answer the purpose, when another Confederacy has been formed in our very midst? It would be two years at least before any thing could be accomplished by a Convention, and then it would be too late. We all know how delegates to such a Convention are elected. We all know how much time would be consumed before the Convention could meet. I say we cannot bear the delay. I ask the gentleman (Mr. BALDWIN) of Connecticut whether he thinks it would be safe to delay. Mr. BALDWIN:--I think it is always safe to follow the Constitution. I think we can follow the example of Kentucky. Mr. CLAY:--I would suggest to the gentleman from Connecticut that the representatives of Kentucky are here to speak for her. Mr. BRONSON:--Kentucky has sent delegates to this Convention since she passed the resolutions to which the gentleman refers. I think we cannot stand upon the ground taken in these resolutions. I do not believe Kentucky herself would be satisfied with them now. It is strange to see gentlemen so cool and apathetic under such circumstances. Is no one alarmed for the safety of the old flag about which so much is said? Can the Border States stay with us when their brethren are gone? If the action of the North in relation to slavery is such as to drive out South Carolina, can Delaware and the other Border States remain? For one, I do not wish to put this Constitution into the hands of a General Convention. Who can tell what such a convention would do with the Constitution; what it would do with the decisions of the Supreme Court, under which so many of the vexatious questions have been settled? It would be worse than attempting to settle our differences
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273  
274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Convention

 

States

 

Kentucky

 

follow

 
Constitution
 

gentleman

 

Connecticut

 

resolutions

 
Border
 

BALDWIN


delegates
 
Island
 

matter

 

alarmed

 

safety

 

apathetic

 

circumstances

 

gentlemen

 

divisions

 

satisfied


passed
 

BRONSON

 

representatives

 

refers

 

ground

 

strange

 
decisions
 
Supreme
 

convention

 
General

vexatious

 

attempting

 
settle
 

differences

 

questions

 
settled
 
action
 

relation

 

brethren

 

suggest


slavery

 

remain

 

Delaware

 
Carolina
 

thinks

 
southern
 

sisters

 

circumlocution

 

separate

 
answer