FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
ion of the Monarchy, continues to be the Entente's objective, we must fight on in the certain hope of crushing that spirit of destruction. (2) But as our war is purely a defensive war, it will on no account be carried on for purposes of conquest. (3) Any semblance of the weakening of our allied relations must be avoided. (4) No concession of Hungarian territory may take place without the knowledge of the Prime Minister. (5) Should the Austrian Ministry agree with the Foreign Minister respecting a cession of Austrian territory, the Hungarian Prime Minister will naturally acquiesce. When the conference in London and the destruction of the Monarchy came into question, Tisza was entirely in the right, and that he otherwise to the end adhered to his standpoint is proved on the occasion of his last visit to the Southern Slavs, which he undertook at the request of the Emperor immediately before the collapse, and when in the most marked manner he showed himself to be opposed to the aspirations of the Southern Slavs. Whoever attempts to judge in objective fashion must not, when looking back from to-day, relegate all that has since happened to former discernible facts, but should consider that, in spite of all pessimism and all fears, the hopes of a reasonable peace of understanding, even though involving sacrifices, still existed, and that it was impossible to plunge the Monarchy into a catastrophe at once for fear of its coming later. If the situation is described to-day as though the inhabitants of the Monarchy, and especially the Social Democrats, were favourably disposed for any eventuality, even for a separate peace, I must again most emphatically repudiate it. I bear in mind that Social Democracy without doubt was the party most strongly in favour of peace, and also that Social Democracy in Germany, as with us, repeatedly stated that there were certain limits to its desire for peace. The German Social Democrats never agreed that Alsace-Lorraine ought to be given up, and never have our Social Democrats voted for ceding Trieste, Bozen and Meran. This would in any case have been the price of peace--and also the price of a separate peace--for, as I have already pointed out, at the conference in London, which dates back to 1915, binding obligations had been entered into for the partition of the Monarchy, while all that had been promised to Italy.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Social
 

Monarchy

 
Minister
 

Democrats

 
conference
 
London
 
Austrian
 

Southern

 

separate

 

Democracy


destruction

 

objective

 

Hungarian

 

territory

 

inhabitants

 

situation

 

coming

 

disposed

 

favourably

 

binding


obligations

 

promised

 

involving

 

understanding

 
reasonable
 
sacrifices
 

partition

 

plunge

 

catastrophe

 

impossible


entered

 
existed
 
repeatedly
 

stated

 

pessimism

 

Germany

 

favour

 

limits

 

Lorraine

 
German

agreed
 
desire
 

ceding

 

emphatically

 
repudiate
 

Alsace

 

eventuality

 

strongly

 

Trieste

 
pointed