FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>  
n miles south of Reading, which has been completely excavated with care and thoroughness. Here a few fairly complete inscriptions on stone have been discovered, and many fragments of others, which prove that the public language of the town was Latin.[1] The speech of ordinary conversation is equally well attested by smaller inscribed objects, and the evidence is remarkable, since it plainly refers to the lower class of Callevans. When a weary brick-maker scrawls SATIS with his finger on a tile, or some prouder spirit writes CLEMENTINVS FECIT TVBVL(_um_) (Clementinus made this box-tile), when a bit of Samian is marked FVR--presumably as a warning from the servants of one house to those of the next--or a rude brick shows the word PVELLAM--probably part of an amatory sentence otherwise lost--or another brick gives a Roman date, the 'sixth day before the Calends of October', we may be sure that the lower classes of Calleva used Latin alike at their work and in their more frivolous moments (Figs. 2, 3, 4). When we find a tile scratched over with cursive lettering--possibly part of a writing lesson--which ends with a tag from the _Aeneid_, we recognize that not even Vergil was out of place here.[2] The Silchester examples are so numerous and remarkable that they admit of no other interpretation.[3] [Footnote 1: For these and for the following _graffiti_ see my account in the _Victoria History of Hampshire_, i. 275, 282-4. For the 'Clementinus' tile (discovered since) see _Archaeologia_, lviii. 30. Silchester lies in a stoneless country, so that stone inscriptions would naturally be few and would easily be used up for later building. Moreover, its cemeteries have not yet been explored, and only one tombstone has come accidentally to light.] [Footnote 2: Sir E.M. Thompson, _Greek and Latin Palaeography_ (1894), p. 211, first suggested this explanation; _Eph._ ix. 1293.] [Footnote 3: To call them--as did a kindly Belgian critic of this paper in its first published form--'un nombre de faits trop peu considerable' is really to misstate the case.] [Illustration: FIG. 2. ... _puellam_.] [Illustration: FIG. 3. _Fecit tubul(um) Clementinus_.] [Illustration: FIG. 4. _vi K(alendas) Oct(obres)_....] [Illustration: FIGS. 2, 3, 4. GRAFFITI ON TILES FROM SILCHESTER. (P. 25.)] [Illustration: FIG. 5. GRAFFITO ON A TILE FOUND AT SILCHESTER (P. 25). _Pertacus perfidus campester Lucilianus Campanus conticuere omnes._ (Probably
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>  



Top keywords:
Illustration
 

Footnote

 

Clementinus

 

SILCHESTER

 

remarkable

 

inscriptions

 
Silchester
 

discovered

 

building

 
accidentally

Thompson

 

tombstone

 

cemeteries

 

explored

 
Moreover
 

Archaeologia

 

graffiti

 
account
 

Victoria

 

History


interpretation

 

Hampshire

 
country
 

stoneless

 

naturally

 

easily

 
kindly
 

GRAFFITI

 
alendas
 
puellam

GRAFFITO

 

Campanus

 

Lucilianus

 

conticuere

 

Probably

 

campester

 

perfidus

 

Pertacus

 

misstate

 
suggested

explanation
 

Belgian

 

considerable

 

nombre

 
critic
 

published

 

Palaeography

 
scrawls
 

finger

 

plainly