FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292  
293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   >>   >|  
is he right at the bottom? I do not know anything about it; I do not _wish_ to know anything; I do not need it, since I _know_, from other sources, that 'Bourrienne's Memoirs' are hardly less spurious than, say, the 'Souvenirs of the Marquise de Crequi' or the 'Memoirs of Monsieur d'Artagnan.' But if these so-called 'Memoirs' are really not his, what has Bourrienne himself to do here? and suppose the former secretary of the First Consul to have been, instead of the shameless embezzler whom Prince Napoleon so fully and so uselessly describes to us, the most honest man in the world, would the 'Memoirs' be any more reliable, since it is a fact that _he_ wrote nothing? ... And now I cannot but wonder at the tone in which those who contradict M. Taine, and especially Prince Napoleon himself, condescend to tell him that he lacks that which would be needed in order to speak of Napoleon or the Revolution. But who is it, then, that _has_ what is needed in order to judge Napoleon? Frederick the Great, or Catherine II., perhaps,--as Napoleon himself desired, "his peers"; or in other words, those who, born as he was for war and government, can only admire, justify, and glorify themselves in him. And who will judge the Revolution? Danton. we suppose, or Robespierre,--that is, the men who were the Revolution itself. No: the real judge will be the average opinion of men; the force that will create, modify, correct this average opinion, the historians will be; and among the historians of our time, in spite of Prince Napoleon, it will be M. Taine for a large share. THE LITERATURES OF FRANCE, ENGLAND, AND GERMANY Twice at least in the course of their long history, it is known that the literature and even the language of France has exerted over the whole of Europe an influence, whose universal character other languages perhaps more harmonious,--Italian for instance,--and other literatures more original in certain respects, like English literature, have never possessed. It is in a purely French form that our mediaeval poems, our 'Chansons de Geste,' our 'Romances of the Round Table,' our _fabliaux_ themselves, whencesoever they came,--Germany or Tuscany, England or Brittany, Asia or Greece,--conquered, fascinated, charmed, from one end of Europe to the other, the imaginations of the Middle Ages. The amorous languor and the subtlety of our "courteous poetry" are breathed no less by the madrigals of Shakespeare himself than by Petra
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292  
293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Napoleon

 

Memoirs

 
Prince
 

Revolution

 
literature
 

suppose

 

needed

 
Europe
 

opinion

 

Bourrienne


historians

 

average

 

influence

 
LITERATURES
 

character

 

harmonious

 
languages
 

universal

 

history

 

Italian


GERMANY
 

ENGLAND

 
FRANCE
 
exerted
 

language

 
France
 

mediaeval

 

charmed

 

imaginations

 

Middle


fascinated

 

conquered

 

England

 
Brittany
 

Greece

 

madrigals

 

Shakespeare

 

breathed

 

poetry

 

amorous


languor

 

subtlety

 
courteous
 

Tuscany

 

Germany

 

possessed

 

purely

 

English

 

literatures

 
original