FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578  
579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   >>   >|  
lina, aye: South Carolina, aye. A motion was then made by Mr. Bland, seconded by Mr. Lee, to strike out the clause so amended, and, on the question "Shall it stand," it passed in the negative; New Hampshire, aye; Massachusetts, no; Rhode Island, no; Connecticut, no; New Jersey, aye; Pennsylvania, aye; Delaware, no; Maryland, aye; Virginia, aye; North Carolina, aye; South Carolina, no; so the clause was struck out. The arguments used by those who were for rating slaves high were, that the expense of feeding and clothing them was as far below that incident to freemen as their industry and ingenuity were below those of freemen; and that the warm climate within which the States having slaves lay, compared with the rigorous climate and inferior fertility of the others, ought to have greater weight in the case; and that the exports of the former States were greater than of the latter. On the other side, it was said, that slaves were not put to labor as young as the children of laboring families; that, having no interest in their labor, they did as little as possible and omitted every exertion of thought requisite to facilitate and expedite it: that if the exports of the States having slaves exceeded those of the others, their imports were in proportion, slaves being employed wholly in agriculture, not in manufacturers; and that, in fact, the balance of trade formerly was much more against the Southern States than the others. On the main question, New Hampshire, aye; Massachusetts, no; Rhode Island, no; Connecticut, no; New York (Mr. Lloyd, aye); New Jersey, aye; Delaware, no; Maryland, aye; Virginia, aye; North Carolina, aye; South Carolina, no. _pp._ 423-4-5. Tuesday, April 1, 1783. Congress resumed the Report on Revenue, &c. Mr. Hamilton, who had been absent when the last question was taken for substituting numbers in place of the value of land, moved to reconsider that vote. He was seconded by Mr. Osgood. Those who voted differently from their former votes were influenced by the conviction of the necessity of the change, and despair on both sides of a more favorable rate of the slaves. The rate of three-fifths was agreed to without opposition. _p_. 430. Monday, May 26. The Resolutions on the Journal, instructing the ministers in Europe to remonstrate against the carrying off the negroes--also those for furloughing the troops--passed _unanimously_. _p_. 456. * * * * * _Extract fr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578  
579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slaves

 
Carolina
 

States

 

question

 
Virginia
 

Maryland

 
Delaware
 

freemen

 

climate

 

Massachusetts


seconded

 

Jersey

 

exports

 

greater

 

clause

 

Hampshire

 

passed

 
Connecticut
 

Island

 

substituting


numbers
 

Osgood

 
reconsider
 
Congress
 

Tuesday

 

resumed

 

absent

 

Hamilton

 
Report
 

Revenue


agreed

 
ministers
 

Europe

 

remonstrate

 

instructing

 

Journal

 

Resolutions

 

carrying

 

Extract

 

unanimously


troops

 

negroes

 

furloughing

 

Monday

 

necessity

 
change
 

despair

 
conviction
 

influenced

 

differently