FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  
o the contracting parties are, and what each agrees to do. Why is the contract in writing? How many copies of it are made? Who keep them, and why? If you had a bill against the district, how would you proceed to get your money? If the district refused or neglected to pay you, what could you do? If some one owed the district and refused to pay, what could it do? Who owns the school buildings and grounds? How was ownership obtained? If it seemed best to erect a new schoolhouse in some other part of the district, what could be done with the present buildings and grounds? Could the district buy land for other than school purposes? Could it lend money if it had any to spare? If the district had not money enough to erect its buildings, what could it do? What are the corporate powers of a district? _Questions for Debate._ _Resolved,_ That it is unfair to tax a bachelor to support a school. _Resolved,_ That the town system is better than the district system. CHAPTER II. PRIMITIVE MODES OF ADMINISTERING JUSTICE. Trial by Ordeal.--Boys settle some matters about which they cannot agree by "tossing up a penny," or by "drawing cuts." In a game of ball they determine "first innings" by "tossing the bat." Differences in a game of marbles, they settle by guessing "odd or even," or by "trying it over to prove it." In all these modes of adjustment there is an appeal to _chance._ Probably behind these practices is the feeling that the boy who ought to win will somehow guess right. This appealing to chance to settle questions of fact is characteristic of society in its primitive state. Modes of establishing justice similar in principle to these boy practices prevail to this day among superstitious peoples. They have prevailed even in Europe, not only among people of low mental power, but also among the cultured Greeks. Among our own Saxon ancestors the following modes of trial are known to have been used: A person accused of crime was required to walk blindfolded and barefoot over a piece of ground on which hot ploughshares lay at unequal distances, or to plunge his arm into hot water. If in either case he escaped unhurt he was declared innocent. This was called Trial by Ordeal. The theory was that Providence would protect the innocent. Trial by Battle.--Sometimes boys settle their disputes by _fighting_. This, too, was one of the modes of adjudication prevalent in early times among men. Trial by Battle was intr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
district
 

settle

 
buildings
 

school

 
grounds
 
tossing
 
Resolved
 

Ordeal

 

system

 

refused


Battle

 

innocent

 

practices

 

chance

 

mental

 

appealing

 

cultured

 

Greeks

 

questions

 

people


prevailed

 

establishing

 

prevail

 

principle

 
justice
 
similar
 

superstitious

 

peoples

 

society

 

Europe


primitive

 
characteristic
 
called
 

declared

 

theory

 

Providence

 

unhurt

 

escaped

 

protect

 
Sometimes

prevalent
 
adjudication
 

disputes

 

fighting

 
plunge
 

person

 

accused

 

ancestors

 

required

 
ploughshares