FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489  
490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   >>   >|  
d I _am_ thankful as I ought to be." These two extracts are very gratifying to our hearts. I must now wish you good-bye. With Albert's affectionate love, ever your devoted Niece, VICTORIA R. [Pageheading: THE PROVOSTSHIP OF ETON] [Pageheading: DR GOODFORD] _Viscount Palmerston to Sir Charles Phipps._ 94 PICCADILLY, _10th February 1861_. MY DEAR PHIPPS,--In the box which I sent to the Queen on Friday morning, giving a short account of the Debate on Thursday, I placed a separate paper submitting for her approval that Dr Goodford, Headmaster of Eton, might be recommended to the Fellows to be elected to the office of Provost now vacant; and I mentioned that the matter was rather pressing. I have had no answer as yet, and the election is fixed for to-morrow. The election is on the same footing as that of a bishop who is nominally elected by the Chapter of the Diocese, but who is named for being so elected by the Crown. The Crown recommends the person to be named Provost, and the Fellows as a matter of course elect him. But the election must be made within a stated period--I believe fifteen days after the vacancy has happened; and if the Crown does not within that period recommend, the Fellows proceed to make their own choice. The election is fixed for to-morrow, and it would not, I think, be desirable to let the Royal prerogative drop on this occasion. The persons who have been named as candidates are Dr Goodford, Headmaster, and with regard to him it is to be said that the office has generally been given to the Headmaster, and that, as far as the Provost has any function connected with improvements in the arrangement of the school, there is an advantage in his having been conversant with the details of the existing system. Dr Goodford is qualified for the office by his degree. The next candidate is Mr Coleridge, once a master in the school, but he is not qualified by a sufficient degree, and there was a prejudice against him on account of his Puseyite tendencies. The third is Dr Chapman, late Bishop of Colombo, qualified by his degree, but having no peculiar claims or other recommendations for the office. The fourth is Mr Birch, formerly tutor to the Prince of Wales, scarcely of sufficient calibre for the office, and not qualified by a sufficient degree. Between Dr Goodford and Dr Chapman I think the preference should be given to Dr Goodford, and the more especially because Dr Chapma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489  
490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

office

 

Goodford

 

election

 

degree

 

qualified

 

Fellows

 
Headmaster
 

elected

 
sufficient
 

Provost


morrow

 
account
 
Pageheading
 
school
 

matter

 
Chapman
 

period

 
generally
 

function

 

proceed


recommend
 

happened

 

improvements

 

connected

 

arrangement

 

prerogative

 

occasion

 

persons

 
regard
 

desirable


choice

 

extracts

 

candidates

 

advantage

 

fourth

 

recommendations

 

Colombo

 

peculiar

 
claims
 
Prince

Chapma
 

preference

 
scarcely
 
calibre
 

Between

 
Bishop
 

system

 

thankful

 

existing

 
details