FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764  
765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   >>   >|  
t of the record. For if there is no plea in abatement, and the want of jurisdiction does not appear in any other part of the transcript brought up by the writ of error, the undisputed averment of citizenship in the declaration must be taken in this court to be true. In this case, the citizenship is averred, but it is denied by the defendant in the manner required by the rules of pleading, and the fact upon which the denial is based is admitted by the demurrer. And, if the plea and demurrer, and judgment of the court below upon it, are before us upon this record, the question to be decided is, whether the facts stated in the plea are sufficient to show that the plaintiff is not entitled to sue as a citizen in a court of the United States. We think they are before us. The plea in abatement and the judgment of the court upon it, are a part of the judicial proceedings in the Circuit Court, and are there recorded as such; and a writ of error always brings up to the superior court the whole record of the proceedings in the court below. And in the case of the United States _v._ Smith, (11 Wheat., 172,) this court said, that the case being brought up by writ of error, the whole record was under the consideration of this court. And this being the case in the present instance, the plea in abatement is necessarily under consideration; and it becomes, therefore, our duty to decide whether the facts stated in the plea are or are not sufficient to show that the plaintiff is not entitled to sue as a citizen in a court of the United States. This is certainly a very serious question, and one that now for the first time has been brought for decision before this court. But it is brought here by those who have a right to bring it, and it is our duty to meet it and decide it. The question is simply this: Can a negro whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights and privileges and immunities guaranteed to the citizen? One of which rights is the privilege of suing in a court of the United States in the cases specified in the Constitution. It will be observed, that the plea applies to that class of persons only whose ancestors were negroes of the African race, and imported into this country, and sold and held as slaves. The only matter in issue before
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764  
765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

brought

 
United
 

record

 

citizen

 

entitled

 

question

 
abatement
 

stated

 

sufficient


consideration

 

decide

 

plaintiff

 

imported

 
slaves
 

country

 

ancestors

 

proceedings

 

demurrer

 

Constitution


rights

 

citizenship

 
judgment
 
African
 
simply
 

matter

 
negroes
 

decision

 
privileges
 
immunities

guaranteed
 

existence

 
formed
 
member
 

political

 

community

 
privilege
 
observed
 

applies

 
persons

Circuit

 

denied

 

averred

 

defendant

 

manner

 

denial

 
pleading
 

required

 
declaration
 

jurisdiction