FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659  
660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   >>   >|  
commentators and religions writers, the latter of whom have, I believe, for the most part, adopted the term "slave," or used both terms indiscriminately. If, then, these Hebrew and Greek words include the idea of both systems of servitude, the conditional and unconditional, they should, as the major includes the minor proposition, be always translated "slaves," unless the sense of the whole text forbids it. The real question, then is, what idea is intended to be conveyed by the words used in the commandment quoted? And it is clear to my mind, that as no limitation is affixed to them, and the express intention was to secure to mankind the peaceful enjoyment of every species of property, that the terms "men-servants and maid-servants" include all classes of servants, and establish a lawful, exclusive, and indefeasible interest equally in the "Hebrew brother who shall go out in the seventh year," and "the yearly hired servant," and "those purchased from the heathen round about," who were to be "bond-men forever," _as the property of their fellow-man_. You cannot deny that there were among the Hebrews "bond-men forever." You cannot deny that God especially authorized his chosen people to purchase "bond-men forever" from the heathen, as recorded in the twenty-fifth chapter of Leviticus, and that they are there designated by the very Hebrew word used in the tenth commandment. Nor can you deny that a "BOND-MAN FOREVER" is a "SLAVE;" yet you endeavor to hang an argument of immortal consequence upon the wretched subterfuge, that the precise word "slave" is not to be found in the _translation_ of the Bible. As if the translators were canonical expounders of the Holy Scriptures, and _their words_, not _God's meaning_, must be regarded as his revelation. It is vain to look to Christ or any of his apostles to justify such blasphemous perversions of the word of God. Although slavery in its most revolting form was everywhere visible around them, no visionary notions of piety or philanthropy ever tempted them to gainsay the LAW, even to mitigate the cruel severity of the existing system. On the contrary, regarding slavery as an _established_, as well as _inevitable condition of human society_, they never hinted at such a thing as its termination on earth, any more than that "the poor may cease out of the land," which God affirms to Moses shall never be: and they exhort "all servants under the yoke" to "count their masters as worthy
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659  
660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
servants
 

forever

 

Hebrew

 

commandment

 

slavery

 

property

 
heathen
 

include

 

masters

 

meaning


regarded
 

revelation

 

Christ

 
perversions
 
Although
 
writers
 

religions

 
blasphemous
 

apostles

 

justify


Scriptures

 

wretched

 

subterfuge

 

precise

 

consequence

 
immortal
 

endeavor

 
argument
 

canonical

 

expounders


worthy

 

translators

 

translation

 

revolting

 
commentators
 

hinted

 
society
 

established

 

inevitable

 

condition


termination

 

affirms

 

contrary

 
visionary
 

notions

 
philanthropy
 
exhort
 

visible

 
tempted
 
severity