has been horribly annoyed by other
matters besides the Catholic affair.

March 18th, 1829 {p.189}

I was at Windsor for the Council and the Recorder's report. We
waited above two hours; of course his Majesty did not get up till
we were all there. A small attendance in Council--the Duke,
Bathurst, Aberdeen, Melville, and I think no other Cabinet
Minister. I sent for Batchelor, the King's _valet de chambre_,
and had a pretty long conversation with him; he talked as if the
walls had ears, but was anxious to tell me everything. He
confirmed all I had before heard of the King's life, and said he
was nearly dead of it, that he was in high favour, and the King
had given him apartments in the Lodge and some presents. His
Majesty has been worried to death, and has not yet made up his
mind to the Catholic Bill (this man knows, I'll be bound). But
what he most dwelt on was Sir William Knighton. I said to him
that the King was afraid of the Duke. He replied he thought not;
he thought he was afraid of nobody but of Knighton, that he hated
him, but that his influence and authority were without any limit,
that he could do anything, and without him nothing could be done;
that after him Lady Conyngham was all-powerful, but in entire
subserviency to him; that she did not dare have anybody to dine
there without previously ascertaining that Knighton would not
disapprove of it; that he knew everything, and nobody dared say
or do a thing of any sort without his permission. There was a
sort of mysterious awe with which he spoke of Knighton, mixed
with dislike, which was curious. He is to call on me when he
comes to London, and will, I dare say, tell me more. Returned to
town at night, and heard of Sadler's speech[5] and read it. It is
certainly very clever, but better as reported than as it was
delivered. He sent the report to the 'Morning Journal' himself,
and added some things and omitted others, and thereby improved
it. He is sixty-seven years old, and it is his maiden speech;
certainly very remarkable and indicative of much talent. Lord
Harrowby told me he heard it, and was greatly struck by it.

[5] [Mr. Sadler, who had never sat in Parliament before,
was returned by the Duke of Newcastle at this time for
the express purpose of opposing the Catholic Relief
Bill, which he did with considerable ability.]

[Page Head: DEBATE ON THE CATHOLIC BILL.]

March 19th, 1829 {p.190}

Last night the de