FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285  
286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>   >|  
s unworthy of retaining the "inheritance" of the Charter, the powers and objects of which they had so greatly perverted and abused. The King had expressly declared that the prosecution against the Charter would be abandoned if they would submit to his decision in regard to what had been matters of complaint and dispute between them and their fellow-colonists and Sovereign for more than fifty years, and which decision should be added to the Charter as explanatory regulations, and should embrace nothing affecting their religious liberties or local elective self-government. They refused, and lost their Charter; Rhode Island and Connecticut submitted, and even resigned their Charters, and were afterwards authorized to resume them, with the privileges and powers conferred by them unimpaired, including the election of their Governors as well as legislators, etc.] [Footnote 190: Hutchinson's History of Massachusetts Bay, Vol. I., pp. 338, 339.] [Footnote 191: Hildreth's History of the United States, Vol. I., Chap. xiv., p. 507. The notice to the Corporation and Company of Massachusetts to answer to the writ of _quo warranto_ was received October, 1683; the final judgment of the Court vacating the Charter was given July, 1685, nearly two years afterwards. (Hutchinson, Vol. I., pp. 337-340.)] [Footnote 192: History of New England, Vol. III., B. iii., Chap. ix., pp. 380, 381.] [Footnote 193: Palfrey's History of New England, Vol. III., B. iii., Chap. ix., pp. 394, 395.] [Footnote 194: History of Massachusetts Bay, Vol. I., p. 340. "The Charter fell. This was the last effective act of Charles the Second relative to Massachusetts; for before a new Government could be settled, the monarch was dead. His death and that of the Charter were nearly contemporary." (Barry's History of Massachusetts, First Period, Chap. xvii., p. 478).] [Footnote 195: The conclusion of this letter is as follows: "Sir, for the things of my soul, I have these many years hung upon your lips, and ever shall; and in civil things am desirous you may know with all plainness my reasons of procedure, and that they may be satisfactory to you. I am, sir, your servant, "J. DUDLEY. From your own house, May 17th, '86."] [Footnote 196: History of Massachusetts Bay, Vol. I., pp. 350, 351, 352. "Though eighteen months had elapsed since the Charter was vacated, the Government was still going on as before. The General Court, though attended thinly, was i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285  
286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Charter
 

History

 

Footnote

 

Massachusetts

 

things

 

England

 

Hutchinson

 

Government

 

powers

 
decision

Period

 

contemporary

 

relative

 

Palfrey

 

effective

 

settled

 

monarch

 
Charles
 
Second
 
Though

eighteen

 

months

 

General

 

attended

 

thinly

 

elapsed

 

vacated

 

DUDLEY

 
letter
 

procedure


satisfactory
 
servant
 

reasons

 
plainness
 
desirous
 
conclusion
 

answer

 

explanatory

 
regulations
 
fellow

colonists
 

Sovereign

 

embrace

 
government
 
refused
 

elective

 

affecting

 

religious

 

liberties

 

dispute