FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  
ismembered by Congress, or restrained in the exercise of her constitutional powers." Here the executive government acknowledges that it made promises to Georgia, which it has been unable to perform--that it guaranteed to that state the possession of lands over which it had no legitimate control, on the mere assumption of being able to make their purchase. The Cherokees in their petition and memorials to Congress show, that Great Britain never exercised any sovereignty over them;--that in peace and in war she always treated them as a free people, and never assumed to herself the right of interfering with their internal government:--that in every treaty made with them by the United States, their sovereignty and total independence are clearly acknowledged, and that they have ever been considered as a distinct nation, exercising all the privileges and immunities enjoyed by any independent people. They say, "In addition to that first of all rights, the right of inheritance and peaceable possession, we have the faith and pledge of the United States, over and over again, in treaties made at various times. By these treaties our rights as a separate people are distinctly acknowledged, and guarantees given that they shall be secured and protected. So we have also understood the treaties. The conduct of the government towards us, from its organization until very lately--the talks given to our beloved men by the Presidents of the United States--and the speeches of the agents and commissioners--all concur to show that we are not mistaken in our interpretation. Some of our beloved men who signed the treaties are still living, and their testimony tends to the same conclusion." * * * * "In what light shall we view the conduct of the United States and Georgia in their intercourse with us, in urging us to enter into treaties and cede lands? If we were but tenants at will, why was it necessary that our consent must first be obtained before these governments could take lawful possession of our lands? The answer is obvious. These governments perfectly understand our rights--our right to the country, and our right to self-government. Our understanding of the treaties is further supported by the intercourse law of the United States, which prohibits all encroachment on our territory." The arguments used by the Cherokees are unanswerable; but in what will that avail them, when injustice is intended by a superior power, which, regardless of n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
treaties
 

United

 

States

 

government

 

people

 
rights
 
possession
 

conduct

 
acknowledged
 

Congress


sovereignty

 

governments

 
Cherokees
 

Georgia

 
intercourse
 

beloved

 
conclusion
 
interpretation
 

Presidents

 

speeches


agents

 

organization

 

commissioners

 

concur

 

signed

 

living

 

mistaken

 

urging

 

testimony

 

prohibits


encroachment

 
territory
 

supported

 

understanding

 

arguments

 
superior
 

intended

 
injustice
 

unanswerable

 
country

understand
 

consent

 
tenants
 
obtained
 

obvious

 

perfectly

 
answer
 

lawful

 
peaceable
 

purchase