FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   >>  
erved before, and which he knew were not produced either by potash or soda. He then set to work to analyse the mixture, and ultimately succeeded in separating two new alkaline substances. When he had succeeded in getting them separate, it was of course by the Method of Difference that he ascertained them to be capable of producing the lines that had excited his curiosity. [Footnote 1: Bain's _Logic_, vol. ii. p. 64.] [Footnote 2: Herschel's _Discourse_, Sec. 158.] [Footnote 3: De Morgan's _Budget of Paradoxes_, p. 237.] CHAPTER VII. THE METHOD OF EXPLANATION. Given perplexity as to the cause of any phenomenon, what is our natural first step? We may describe it as searching for a clue: we look carefully at the circumstances with a view to finding some means of assimilating what perplexes us to what is already within our knowledge. Our next step is to make a guess, or conjecture, or, in scientific language, a hypothesis. We exercise our Reason or _Nous_, or Imagination, or whatever we choose to call the faculty, and try to conceive some cause that strikes us as sufficient to account for the phenomenon. If it is not at once manifest that this cause has really operated, our third step is to consider what appearances ought to present themselves if it did operate. We then return to the facts in question, and observe whether those appearances do present themselves. If they do, and if there is no other way of accounting for the effect in all its circumstances, we conclude that our guess is correct, that our hypothesis is proved, that we have reached a satisfactory explanation. These four steps or stages may be distinguished in most protracted inquiries into cause. They correspond to the four stages of what Mr. Jevons calls the Inductive Method _par excellence_, Preliminary Observation, Hypothesis, Deduction and Verification. Seeing that the word Induction is already an overloaded drudge, perhaps it would be better to call these four stages the Method of Explanation. The word Induction, if we keep near its original and most established meaning, would apply strictly only to the fourth stage, the Verification, the bringing in of the facts to confirm our hypothesis. We might call the method the Newtonian method, for all four stages are marked in the prolonged process by which he made good his theory of Gravitation. To give the name of Inductive Method simply to all the four stages of an orderly
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   >>  



Top keywords:

stages

 

Method

 

hypothesis

 
Footnote
 
Induction
 

Verification

 
appearances
 

Inductive

 

present

 

succeeded


phenomenon
 

circumstances

 

method

 

satisfactory

 

explanation

 
effect
 

observe

 

question

 

return

 
operate

correct

 
proved
 

conclude

 

accounting

 

reached

 

excellence

 

bringing

 
confirm
 

Newtonian

 

fourth


established

 

meaning

 

strictly

 

marked

 

simply

 

orderly

 

Gravitation

 

theory

 

prolonged

 

process


original

 

Jevons

 

operated

 

Preliminary

 

correspond

 

protracted

 
inquiries
 

Observation

 

Hypothesis

 

Explanation