The Project Gutenberg EBook of Natural History of the Brush Mouse
(Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas With Description of a New Subspecies, by Charles A. Long
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: Natural History of the Brush Mouse (Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas With Description of a New Subspecies
Author: Charles A. Long
Release Date: February 9, 2010 [EBook #31235]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ASCII
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK BRUSH MOUSE ***
Produced by Chris Curnow, Erica Pfister-Altschul, Joseph
Cooper and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net
[Transcriber's Note: The following error is noted, but left as printed:
Page 105, "the must abundant rodent" should be "the most abundant
rodent"]
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS
MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Volume 14, No. 6, pp. 99-110, 1 fig.
December 29, 1961
Natural History of the Brush Mouse
(Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas
With Description of a New Subspecies
BY
CHARLES A. LONG
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
LAWRENCE
1961
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr.
Volume 14, No. 6, pp. 99-110, 1 fig.
Published December 29, 1961
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
Lawrence, Kansas
PRINTED BY
JEAN M. NEIBARGER, STATE PRINTER
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1961
[Illustration]
28-8518
Natural History of the Brush Mouse (Peromyscus boylii) in Kansas With
Description of a New Subspecies
BY
CHARLES A. LONG
In order to determine the geographic distribution of the brush mouse in
the state, 15 localities, chosen on the basis of suitable habitat, were
investigated by means of snap-trapping in the winter and spring of 1959,
spring of 1960, and winter and spring of 1961. Variation in specimens
obtained by me and in other specimens in the Museum of Natural History,
The University of Kansas, was analyzed. Captive mice from Cherokee
County, Kansas, were observed almost daily from March 27, 1960, to June
1, 1961. Captive mice from Chautauqua and Cowley counties were studied
briefly. Contents of 38 stomachs of brush mice were analyzed, and
diet-preferences of t
|