FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>  
reason: his body could hardly have failed to be identified. "These three explanations are what we may call the outside explanations. They touched none of the parties mentioned; they were all obviously improbable on general grounds; and to all of them there was one conclusive answer--the scarab which was found in Godfrey Bellingham's garden. Hence I put them aside and gave my attention to the fourth explanation. This was that the missing man had been made away with by one of the parties mentioned in the report. But, since the reports mentioned three parties, it was evident that there was a choice of three hypotheses, namely: "(_a_) That John Bellingham had been made away with by Hurst; or (_b_) by the Bellinghams; or (_c_) by Mr. Jellicoe. "Now, I have constantly impressed on my pupils that the indispensable question that must be asked at the outset of such an inquiry as this is, 'When was the missing person last undoubtedly seen or known to be alive?' That is the question that I asked myself after reading the newspaper report; and the answer was, that he was last certainly seen alive on the fourteenth of October, nineteen hundred and two, at 141, Queen Square, Bloomsbury. Of the fact that he was alive at that time and place there could be no doubt whatever; for he was seen at the same moment by two persons, both of whom were intimately acquainted with him, and one of whom, Doctor Norbury, was apparently a disinterested witness. After that date he was never seen, alive or dead, by any person who knew him and was able to identify him. It was stated that he had been seen on the twenty-third of November following by the housemaid of Mr. Hurst; but as this person was unacquainted with him, it was uncertain whether the person whom she saw was or was not John Bellingham. "Hence the disappearance dated, not from the twenty-third of November, as every one seems to have assumed, but from the fourteenth of October; and the question was not, 'What became of John Bellingham after he entered Mr. Hurst's house?' but, 'What became of him after his interview in Queen Square?' "But as soon as I had decided that that interview must form the real starting point of the inquiry, a most striking set of circumstances came into view. It became obvious that if Mr. Jellicoe had had any reason for wishing to make away with John Bellingham, he had such an opportunity as seldom falls to the lot of an intending murderer. "Just
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>  



Top keywords:
Bellingham
 

person

 

question

 
mentioned
 
parties
 
report
 

November

 

Jellicoe

 

inquiry

 

missing


interview
 
October
 

answer

 

explanations

 

Square

 

fourteenth

 

twenty

 

reason

 

identify

 

Norbury


Doctor
 

acquainted

 

intimately

 
apparently
 

stated

 
witness
 
disinterested
 

obvious

 

circumstances

 

striking


wishing

 

intending

 
murderer
 
opportunity
 

seldom

 
starting
 

disappearance

 

persons

 

housemaid

 

unacquainted


uncertain

 

decided

 
assumed
 

entered

 
undoubtedly
 
Godfrey
 

garden

 

conclusive

 
scarab
 

explanation