indicates
whether the existence of a village at or about the year 1850 may be
regarded as certain (C), probable (P), or doubtful (D).

_No. and name_ _Status_ _Comment_

1. omen-hipur C P. 228. Two groups of house pits. No
further information available to Waterman
but regarded as a town by Kroeber (map, p.
9).

2. omen C P. 230. Four house pits but designated as
a town. It was known that a sweathouse
existed and that the people bathed in the
sea. Hence it was inhabited within the
memory of informants. Shown by Kroeber as
a town (map, p. 9).

3. rekwoi C P. 231. No question concerning this town.

4. welkwa C P. 232. No question.

5. tsekwel P P. 232. "This place was mentioned as a
town site," but Waterman could get no
satisfactory data. Since it was mentioned
specifically as a town site by informants
its existence may be regarded as probable.
Mentioned by Kroeber (p. 10) somewhat
doubtfully as a separate village.

6. tmri C P. 232. "Said to have been a village site."
"Captain Jack belonged here." Hence it
certainly was inhabited. The American town
of Requa is located on the site and hence
its organization has been lost. Kroeber
states it as being somewhat doubtful as a
separate village (p. 10) but shows it on
his map as a village occupied only during
certain periods.

7. awmennok P On Merriam's lists as a "village on north
side of Klamath River at foot of Bowie's
hill about 1 mile above present Requa."

8. kere P On Merriam's lists as a "village on south
side Klamath about 2 miles from mouth."

9. kestitsa D See no. 11.

10.