FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   1554  
1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   >>   >|  
have him look at you? Some of the girls say they would n't have him for the whole world, but I shouldn't mind it--especially if I had on my eyeglasses. Do you suppose if there is anything in the evil eye it would go through glass? I don't believe it. Do you think blue eye-glasses would be better than common ones? Don't laugh at me--they tell such weird stories! The Terror--Lurida Vincent, you know-makes fun of all they say about it, but then she 'knows everything and doesn't believe anything,' the girls say--Well, I should be awfully scared, I know, if anybody that had the evil eye should look at me--but--oh, I don't know--but if it was a young man--and if he was very--very good-looking--I think--perhaps I would run the risk--but don't tell anybody I said any such horrid thing--and burn this letter right up--there 's a dear good girl." It is to be hoped that no reader will doubt the genuineness of this letter. There are not quite so many "awfuls" and "awfullys" as one expects to find in young ladies' letters, but there are two "weirds," which may be considered a fair allowance. How it happened that "jolly" did not show itself can hardly be accounted for; no doubt it turns up two or three times at least in the postscript. Here is an extract from another letter. This was from one of the students of Stoughton University to a friend whose name as it was written on the envelope was Mr. Frank Mayfield. The old postmaster who found fault with Miss "Lulu's" designation would probably have quarrelled with this address, if it had come under his eye. "Frank" is a very pretty, pleasant-sounding name, and it is not strange that many persons use it in common conversation all their days when speaking of a friend. Were they really christened by that name, any of these numerous Franks? Perhaps they were, and if so there is nothing to be said. But if not, was the baptismal name Francis or Franklin? The mind is apt to fasten in a very perverse and unpleasant way upon this question, which too often there is no possible way of settling. One might hope, if he outlived the bearer of the appellation, to get at the fact; but since even gravestones have learned to use the names belonging to childhood and infancy in their solemn record, the generation which docks its Christian names in such an un-Christian way will bequeath whole churchyards full of riddles to posterity. How it will puzzle and distress the historians and antiquarians of a comi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1530   1531   1532   1533   1534   1535   1536   1537   1538   1539   1540   1541   1542   1543   1544   1545   1546   1547   1548   1549   1550   1551   1552   1553   1554  
1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

friend

 
common
 

Christian

 

numerous

 

Franks

 

christened

 

designation

 

Mayfield

 

postmaster


quarrelled

 
address
 
persons
 

conversation

 
strange
 
sounding
 

pretty

 

pleasant

 

speaking

 

infancy


childhood

 

solemn

 

record

 

generation

 

belonging

 

learned

 

gravestones

 

posterity

 

puzzle

 
distress

historians

 

riddles

 
bequeath
 

churchyards

 

appellation

 
fasten
 

perverse

 
unpleasant
 

Franklin

 
Francis

baptismal

 

question

 

outlived

 
bearer
 

settling

 

antiquarians

 
Perhaps
 

ladies

 

Vincent

 
horrid