FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166  
167   168   169   >>  
ren, intermingle in marriage? Soc. The greatest of all penalties; for what worse calamity can human beings suffer in the production of offspring than to misbeget? (36) (36) Or, "in the propagation of the species than to produce misbegotten children." Hipp. But how or why should they breed them ill where nothing hinders them, being of a good stock themselves and producing from stock as good? Soc. Because, forsooth, in order to produce good children, it is not simply necessary that the parents should be good and of a good stock, but that both should be equally in the prime and vigour of their bodies. (37) Do you suppose that the seed of those who are at their prime is like theirs who either have not yet reached their prime, or whose prime has passed? (37) Cf. Plat. "Laws," viii. 839 A; Herbst, etc., cf. Grotius, "de Jure," ii. 5, xii. 4. Hipp. No, it is reasonable to expect that the seed will differ. Soc. And for the better--which? Hipp. Theirs clearly who are at their prime. Soc. It would seem that the seed of those who are not yet in their prime or have passed their prime is not good? Hipp. It seems most improbable it should be. Soc. Then the right way to produce children is not that way? Hipp. No, that is not the right way. Soc. Then children who are so produced are produced not as they ought to be? Hipp. So it appears to me. What offspring then (he asked) will be ill produced, ill begotten, and ill born, if not these? I subscribe to that opinion also (replied Hippias). Soc. Well, it is a custom universally respected, is it not, to return good for good, and kindness with kindness? Hipp. Yes, a custom, but one which again is apt to be transgressed. Soc. Then he that so transgresses it pays penalty in finding himself isolated; bereft of friends who are good, and driven to seek after those who love him not. Or is it not so that he who does me kindness in my intercourse with him is my good friend, but if I requite not this kindness to my benefactor, I am hated by him for my ingratitude, and yet I must needs pursue after him and cling to him because of the great gain to me of his society? Hipp. Yes, Socrates. In all these cases, I admit, there is an implication of divine authority; (38) that a law should in itself be loaded with the penalty of its transgression does suggest to my mind a higher than human type of legislator. (38) Lit. "Yes, upon my word, Socrates, al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166  
167   168   169   >>  



Top keywords:

children

 

kindness

 

produced

 

produce

 

penalty

 

Socrates

 

custom

 
passed
 

offspring

 

isolated


friend
 

requite

 

penalties

 

intercourse

 
finding
 
bereft
 

marriage

 

greatest

 

friends

 

driven


universally

 

Hippias

 

replied

 

opinion

 
respected
 

return

 

transgressed

 
calamity
 

transgresses

 

loaded


implication

 

divine

 

authority

 

transgression

 

suggest

 

legislator

 

higher

 

pursue

 
ingratitude
 

subscribe


intermingle

 

society

 

benefactor

 

reached

 

Herbst

 

hinders

 

Because

 

equally

 
parents
 

forsooth