FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312  
313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>  
form (_tanoth_). (Septuagint, [Greek: "drakon"] and [Greek: "strouthos."]) Lam. iv., 3.--Even the In the Hebrew text the word is _sea-monsters_ draw out the _tannin_, evidently an error for breast, they give suck to their _tanim_. The suckling of young, and young ones. The daughter of my association of ostriches, agree with people is become cruel, like this. (Septuagint, "[Greek: drakon].") the ostriches in the wilderness. Micah i., 8.--I will make a The wailing cry accords with the wailing like the _dragons_, and view of Gesenius that the jackal is mourning like the owls meant. [ostriches]. (Septuagint, "[Greek: drakon].") We learn from the above comparative view that the _tannin_ is an aquatic animal of large size, and predaceous, clothed with scales, and a fit emblem of the monarchies of Egypt and Assyria. In two places it is possible that some species of serpent is denoted by it. We must suppose, therefore, that in Genesis i. it denotes large crocodilian and perhaps serpentiform reptiles. The _tan_ is evidently a small mammal of the desert. I omitted to notice in the text a criticism of my explanation of the word _bhemah_ in "Archaia," made in Archdeacon Pratt's "Scripture and Science not at Variance" (edition of 1872). He opposes to the meaning of "herbivorous animals" which I have sought to establish, two exceptional passages. In one of these, Deut. xxviii., 26, the word is used in its most general sense for all beasts, which the context shows can not be its meaning in Gen. i. In the other, Prov. xxx., 30, he says it is applied to the lion. The actual expression used, however, merely implies that the lion is "mighty among _bhemah_," the comparison being probably between the strength of the lion and that of oxen, antelopes, and other strong and active creatures. It does not affirm that the lion is one of the _bhemah_. While I have every respect for the erudition of Archdeacon Pratt, and highly value his book, I must regard this objection as an example of a style of biblical exposition much to be deprecated, though too often employed. I.--ANCIENT MYTHOLOGIES. The current views respecting the relations of ancient mythologies with each other and with the Bible have been continually shifting and oscillating between extrem
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312  
313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>  



Top keywords:

ostriches

 

drakon

 

Septuagint

 

bhemah

 

meaning

 

wailing

 
Archdeacon
 
evidently
 

tannin

 

ancient


relations

 

beasts

 

context

 

respecting

 

herbivorous

 

actual

 

applied

 

general

 

passages

 
continually

extrem

 

exceptional

 

sought

 

establish

 

shifting

 

mythologies

 

animals

 

xxviii

 
oscillating
 

highly


erudition

 

respect

 

deprecated

 

biblical

 

objection

 
exposition
 

regard

 

employed

 

affirm

 

comparison


current

 
mighty
 

implies

 

MYTHOLOGIES

 

strength

 

creatures

 
ANCIENT
 

active

 

antelopes

 
strong