FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   >>  
fore they had been awkwardly interwoven. Courtenay's _Review_ did not go unnoticed at the time, though for obvious reasons it was given less attention by the reviewers than the more notorious Johnsoniana. Extracts from the poem were printed in several magazines. The reviewers were almost unanimous in damning the poem's inelegance, unevenness, and lack of harmony, but reserved praise for the sentiments and candor.[17] Chesterfield's apologist in William Hayley's _Two Dialogues; Containing a Comparative View of the Lives, Characters, and Writings of Philip, the Late Earl of Chesterfield, and Dr. Samuel Johnson_ (1787) protested that Courtenay was too kind to Johnson. The severest indictment of the Review came from the anonymous author of _A Poetical Epistle from the Ghost of Dr. Johnson_, mentioned earlier, who charged Courtenay with poor taste and with belaboring the obvious by proving that Johnson was "not quite destitute of brains."[18] The greatest champion of the _Review_ was, of course, Boswell. The _Life_ is sprinkled with quotations from the third edition, 118 lines in all, mostly from Courtenay's commendatory verses. In view of the many published attacks on Johnson, Boswell must have appreciated Courtenay's sentiments all the more. Doubtless Courtenay's warm praise of the _Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides_ also found favor with Boswell.[19] Perhaps Boswell's final and least partial judgment of the _Review_ was expressed in his letter to James Abercrombie of Philadelphia dated 11 June 1792. He sent Abercrombie a copy of the poem, commenting that "though I except to several passages, you will find some very good writing."[20] Courtenay's _Review_, together with several other little known _memorabilia_ concerning Johnson, stimulated one of the most energetic and splenetic literary controversies of the late eighteenth century. In addition, the _Review_ and pieces like it aroused a considerable amount of useful, if vitriolic, discussion about the art of biography. University of Iowa NOTES TO THE INTRODUCTION [1] See _DNB_. [2] For the information about Courtenay's election, I am indebted to Professor James M. Osborn of Yale University. Boswell gives no precise date for Courtenay's entry into the Club. His first reference to Courtenay's membership occurs in his journal entry of 19 January 1790. See _Private Papers of James Boswell_, ed. Geoffrey Scott and Frederick A. Pottle (Privately Printed, 1
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   >>  



Top keywords:

Courtenay

 

Review

 
Boswell
 

Johnson

 

Chesterfield

 

University

 

sentiments

 

praise

 

Abercrombie

 

reviewers


obvious
 
memorabilia
 
expressed
 

stimulated

 

controversies

 

eighteenth

 
century
 

literary

 

splenetic

 

partial


energetic
 

judgment

 

passages

 

commenting

 

writing

 

letter

 

Philadelphia

 

reference

 

membership

 

precise


occurs
 

journal

 

Frederick

 

Pottle

 

Privately

 

Printed

 

Geoffrey

 

January

 

Private

 

Papers


Osborn
 

vitriolic

 

discussion

 

biography

 

amount

 
pieces
 

aroused

 

considerable

 

Perhaps

 

election