FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386  
387   388   389   390   391   392   >>  
dle of the T'ang Dynasty (Teng Ch'u-min, Naito Torajiro). For many Marxists, the period which we called "Modern Times" is at best a sub-period within a larger period which really started with what we called "Medieval China". p. 196: For the change in the composition of the gentry, I am using my own research.--For clan rules, clan foundations, etc., I used D.C. Twitchett, J. Fischer, Hu Hsien-chin, Ch'ue T'ung-tsu, Niida Noboru and T. Makino. The best analysis of the clan rules is by Wang Hui-chen in D.S. Nivison, _Confucianism in Action_, Stanford 1959, p. 63-96.--I do not regard such marriage systems as "survivals" of ancient systems which have been studied by M. Granet and systematically analysed by C. Levy-Strauss in his _Les structures elementaires de la parente_, Paris 1949, pp. 381-443. In some cases, the reasons for the establishment of such rules can still be recognized.--A detailed study of despotism in China still has to be written. K.A. Wittfogel's _Oriental Despotism_, New Haven 1957 does not go into the necessary detailed work. p. 197: The problem of social mobility is now under study, after preliminary research by K.A. Wittfogel, E. Kracke, myself and others. E. Kracke, Ho Ping-ti, R.M. Marsh and I are now working on this topic.--For the craftsmen and artisans, much material has recently been collected by Chinese scholars. I have used mainly Li Chien-nung and articles in _Li-shih yen-chiu_ 1955, No. 3 and in _Mem. Inst. Orient. Cult_. 1956.--On the origin of guilds see Kat[=o] Shigeru; a general study of guilds and their function has not yet been made (preliminary work by P. Maybon, H.B. Morse, J. St. Burgess, K.A. Wittfogel and others). Comparisons with Near-Eastern guilds on the one hand and with Japanese guilds on the other, are quite interesting but parallels should not be over-estimated. The _tong_ of U.S. Chinatowns (_tang_ in Mandarin) are late and organizations of businessmen only (S. Yokoyama and Laai Yi-faai). They are not the same as the _hui-kuan_. p. 198: For the merchants I used Ch'ue T'ung-tsu, Sung Hsi and Wada Kiyoshi.--For trade, I used extensively Ch'uean Han-sheng and J. Kuwabara.--On labour legislation in early modern times I used Ko Ch'ang-chi and especially Li Chien-nung, also my own studies.--On strikes I used Kat[=o] Shigeru and modern Chinese authors.--The problem of "vagrants" has been taken up by Li Chien-nung who always refers to the original sources and to modern Chinese
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386  
387   388   389   390   391   392   >>  



Top keywords:

guilds

 

modern

 

Wittfogel

 
period
 

Chinese

 
detailed
 

Shigeru

 
systems
 

problem

 
Kracke

preliminary

 
research
 
called
 
Comparisons
 

Burgess

 
Maybon
 

function

 

general

 

articles

 
scholars

collected

 

material

 
recently
 

origin

 

Orient

 

Chinatowns

 

Kuwabara

 

labour

 

legislation

 

Kiyoshi


extensively

 

refers

 

sources

 
original
 

vagrants

 

studies

 
strikes
 

authors

 
merchants
 

parallels


estimated

 
interesting
 

Japanese

 
artisans
 

Yokoyama

 

Mandarin

 
organizations
 

businessmen

 

Eastern

 

Makino