FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
G. 2.] If the signal be given somewhat later still (Fig. 3), i. e., when the foot is being lowered to complete a tap, Hans is still able to put on the brakes--as it were--and draw back his foot before it reaches the ground. The whole process gives the impression that the horse was just about to make a "mistake" of one unit, but at the last moment had bethought himself of the correct answer. [Illustration: FIG. 3.] Finally, if the signal be deferred still longer, it becomes impossible to prevent the extra tap. The back-step again has the same form as in figure 1; Hans has made a "mistake" in his answer by one unit too many. Conversely, if the head-jerk of the questioner occurs too soon; i. e., at the moment the horse has raised his foot for the final tap to the height _b_, (Fig. 4), then the tap is not completed,--but the foot, without touching the ground, makes the curve _b c_{2} d_, back to its original position. Hans has again made a "mistake" in his answer,--this time by one unit too few. [Illustration: FIG. 4.] All these variations go to show one thing: Hans never knows in advance which tap is to be the final one. These variations in his reactions occurred often without having been intended by the questioner. But to bring them about at will required skill, on account of the shortness of the time involved in the reaction. Whenever the signal for stopping--which we have just discussed--was followed by the complete erection of the head and trunk, Hans would definitely cease tapping. If, however, the questioner failed to assume a completely erect position, or if he stooped forward ever so slightly, the horse would follow the back-step of the right foot with an extra tap of the left foot. Besides occurring in tests in which Mr. von Osten assumed the role of questioner, this fact was also noted when the Count zu Castell and Mr. Schillings acted as subjects. Since the extra tap just mentioned was not given like the others with the right foot forward, but with the left foot upon the spot, it was possible for the horse to execute it with a greater show of energy. This simulated a high degree of mental certainty on the part of the horse, as if he wished to indicate that this was the correct solution of the problem and it would have to stand. In spite of all this, many errors would creep in. It was possible to prolong this extra tap and thus make it appear more dilatory. We need hardly add that henceforth it was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
questioner
 

mistake

 
signal
 

answer

 
variations
 
Illustration
 
forward
 

position

 

complete

 

ground


correct

 

moment

 

assumed

 

occurring

 

subjects

 

Schillings

 

Castell

 

Besides

 

completely

 

assume


failed

 

stooped

 

Finally

 

mentioned

 
follow
 
slightly
 

bethought

 

prolong

 

errors

 

henceforth


dilatory

 
problem
 
solution
 

execute

 

greater

 

energy

 

simulated

 

wished

 

certainty

 
mental

degree
 
tapping
 

touching

 

completed

 
brakes
 

lowered

 

prevent

 

original

 

height

 
process