FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331  
332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   >>   >|  
The "cellar" was not really hired till a little before Easter, March 31st. Upon this James himself intervened, submitting to the Commissioners a series of questions with the object of drawing out of the prisoner a true account of himself, and of his relations to Percy. A letter had been found on Fawkes when he was taken, directed not to Johnson, but to Fawkes, and this among other things had raised the King's suspicions. In his third examination, on the afternoon of the 6th, in the presence of Northampton, Devonshire, Nottingham, and Salisbury, Fawkes gave a good deal of information, more or less true, about himself; and, while still maintaining that his real name was Johnson, said that the letter, which was written by a Mrs. Bostock in Flanders, was addressed to him by another name "because he called himself Fawkes," that is to say, because he had acquired the name of Fawkes as an alias. "If he will not otherwise confess," the King had ended by saying, "the gentler tortures are to be first used unto him, _et sic per gradus ad ima tenditur_." To us, living in the nineteenth century, these words are simply horrible. As a Scotchman, however, James had long been familiar with the use of torture as an ordinary means of legal investigation, while even in England, though unknown to the law, that is to say, to the practice of the ordinary courts of justice, it had for some generations been used not infrequently by order of the council to extract evidence from a recalcitrant witness, though, according to Bacon, not for the purpose of driving him to incriminate himself. Surely, if the use of torture was admissible at all, this was a case for its employment. The prisoner had informed the government that he had been at the bottom of a plot of the most sanguinary kind, and had acknowledged by implication that there were fellow-conspirators whom he refused to name. If, indeed, Father Gerard's view of the case, that the government, or at least Salisbury, had for some time known all about the conspiracy, nothing--not even the Gunpowder Plot itself--could be more atrocious than the infliction of torments on a fellow-creature to make him reveal a secret already in their possession. If, however, the evidence I have adduced be worth anything, this was by no means the case. What it shows is that on the afternoon of the 6th all that the members of the government were aware of was that an unknown number of conspirators were at lar
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331  
332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Fawkes

 

government

 

afternoon

 

Salisbury

 
unknown
 

evidence

 

conspirators

 

fellow

 
ordinary
 

torture


letter
 
prisoner
 

Johnson

 

admissible

 

driving

 

incriminate

 

Surely

 

informed

 

sanguinary

 

acknowledged


purpose
 

bottom

 

employment

 

generations

 

justice

 

practice

 
courts
 
infrequently
 

recalcitrant

 
witness

Easter

 

council

 
extract
 

implication

 

reveal

 
creature
 
torments
 

atrocious

 

infliction

 

secret


adduced

 

possession

 

refused

 
Father
 

cellar

 
number
 

Gerard

 

Gunpowder

 

conspiracy

 
members