on?
C. Chesterton: What I accused the Postmaster General of was of
having given a contract which was a byword for laxity and thereby
laying himself open reasonably to the suspicion that he was
conferring a favour on Mr. Godfrey Isaacs because he was the
Attorney-General's brother.
Carson: I must repeat my question, do you accuse the
Postmaster-General of anything dishonest or dishonourable?
C. Chesterton: After the Postmaster-General's denials on oath I
must leave the question; I will not accuse him of perjury.
Carson: And therefore you do not accuse him of anything dishonest
or dishonourable?
AFTER SOME FURTHER QUESTIONING
Judge: That is evasion. Do you or do you not accuse him?
C. Chesterton: I have said "No."
LATER
C. Chesterton: My idea at that time was that Sir Rufus Isaacs had
influenced Mr. Samuel to benefit Godfrey Isaacs.
Carson: You have not that opinion now?
C. Chesterton: Sir Rufus has denied it on oath and I accepted his
denial.
Cecil still insisted that though the Ministers had not been
corrupted, what had come to light about Godfrey's offer of American
Marconi shares to his brother showed that Godfrey had tried to
corrupt them. Godfrey could not have enjoyed the case very much.
There was much emphasis on his concealment of Clause 10 (allowing the
Government to terminate at any time): and Sir Alexander King,
secretary to the Post Office, admitted that Godfrey Isaacs had asked
that it be kept quiet: but this was not among the accusations Cecil
had levelled at him. In his summing up, Mr. Justice Phillimore
indicated the possibility that the shares Godfrey had so gaily sold
belonged not to himself but to the English Marconi Company--merely
adding that this question was not relevant to the present case.
Further the record of his company failures _was_ rather ghastly.
Here is a section of his cross-examination as to the companies he had
been connected with before the Marconi Company--remember that there
were twenty of them!
Wild: I am trying to discover a success.
Judge: It is not an imputation against a man that he has been a
failure.
Wild: Here are cases after cases of failure.
Isaacs: That is my misfortune.
Judge: You might as well cross-examine any speculative widow.
Wild: A speculative widow would not be concerned in the management.
* * *
Wild: Can you point to one su
|