FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  
sonally. Diogenes Laertes could not have written his life to better advantage for his reputation. Lucretius adored him. Seneca, as much of an enemy of the sect as he was, spoke of him in the highest terms. If some cities held him in horror, others erected statues in his honor, and if, among the Christians, the Fathers have condemned him, Gassendi and Bernier approve his principles. In view of all these contrary authorities, how can the question be decided? Shall I say that Epicurus was a corruptor of good morals, on the faith of a jealous philosopher, of a disgruntled disciple, who would have been delighted, in his resentment, to go to the length of inflicting a personal injury? Moreover, had Epicurus intended to destroy the idea of Providence and the immortality of the soul, is it not reasonable to suppose that the world would have revolted against so scandalous a doctrine, and that the life of the philosopher would have been attacked to discredit his opinions more easily? If, therefore, I find it difficult to believe what his enemies and the envious have published against him, I should also easily credit what his partisans have urged in his defence. I do not believe that Epicurus desired to broach a voluptuousness harsher than the virtue of the Stoics. Such a jealousy of austerity would appear to me extraordinary in a voluptuary philosopher, from whatever point of view that word may be considered. A fine secret that, to declaim against a virtue which destroys sentiment in a sage, and establishes one that admits of no operation. The sage, according to the Stoics, is a man of insensible virtue; that of the Epicureans, an immovable voluptuary. The former suffers pain without having any pain; the latter enjoys voluptuousness without being voluptuous--a pleasure without pleasure. With what object in view, could a philosopher who denied the immortality of the soul, mortify the senses? Why divorce the two parties composed of the same elements, whose sole advantage is in a concert of union for their mutual pleasure? I pardon our religious devotees, who diet on herbs, in the hope that they will obtain an eternal felicity, but that a philosopher, who knows no other good than that to be found in this world, that a doctor of voluptuousness should diet on bread and water, to reach sovereign happiness in this life, is something my intelligence refuses to contemplate. I am surprised that the voluptuousness of such an Epicu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  



Top keywords:
philosopher
 
voluptuousness
 
virtue
 

pleasure

 
Epicurus
 

immortality

 
advantage
 
voluptuary
 

Stoics

 

easily


admits

 
operation
 

establishes

 

obtain

 

sovereign

 
eternal
 

insensible

 

felicity

 

sentiment

 

destroys


extraordinary

 

considered

 

surprised

 

Epicureans

 

declaim

 

secret

 

doctor

 

parties

 
religious
 
divorce

intelligence

 
austerity
 

composed

 

happiness

 

mutual

 

pardon

 

concert

 

elements

 

devotees

 

senses


enjoys

 
suffers
 

voluptuous

 

denied

 

mortify

 
refuses
 
object
 

contemplate

 

immovable

 
Gassendi