FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  
an in his writings. Sensual voluptuousness is not less well explained by Cicero. I know that nothing is omitted either to destroy or elude it, but can conjecture be compared with the testimony of Cicero, who was intimately acquainted with the Greek philosophers and their philosophy? It would be better to reject the inequality of mind as an inconstancy of human nature. Where exists the man so uniform of temperament, that he does not manifest contrarieties in his conversation and actions? Solomon merits the name of sage, as much as Epicure for less, and he belied himself equally in his sentiments and conduct. Montaigne, when still young, believed it necessary to always think of death in order to be always ready for it. Approaching old age, however, he recanted, so he says, being willing to permit nature to gently guide him, and teach him how to die. M. Bernier, the great partisan of Epicurus, avows to-day, that "After philosophizing for fifty years, I doubt things of which I was once most assured." All objects have different phases, and the mind which is in perpetual motion, views them from different aspects as they revolve before it. Hence, it may be said, that we see the same thing under different aspects, thinking at the same time that we have discovered something new. Moreover, age brings great changes in our inclinations, and with a change of inclination often comes a change of opinion. Add, that the pleasures of the senses sometimes give rise to contempt for mental gratifications as too dry and unproductive and that the delicate and refined pleasures of the mind, in their turn, scorn the voluptuousness of the senses as gross. So, no one should be surprised that in so great a diversity of aspects and movements, Epicurus, who wrote more than any other philosopher, should have treated the same subjects in a different manner according as he had perceived them from different points of view. What avails this general reasoning to show that he might have been sensible to all kinds of pleasure? Let him be considered according to his relations with the other sex, and nobody will believe that he spent so much time with Leontium and with Themista for the sole purpose of philosophizing. But if he loved the enjoyment of voluptuousness, he conducted himself like a wise man. Indulgent to the movements of nature, opposed to its struggles, never mistaking chastity for a virtue, always considering luxury as a vice, he insist
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>  



Top keywords:

voluptuousness

 

aspects

 

nature

 
philosophizing
 

change

 

pleasures

 

Epicurus

 

senses

 

movements

 
Cicero

contempt

 

mental

 

struggles

 
opposed
 

unproductive

 

delicate

 

gratifications

 

Indulgent

 

refined

 

opinion


Moreover

 
brings
 
discovered
 

insist

 
luxury
 

inclination

 

chastity

 

inclinations

 

virtue

 

mistaking


purpose

 
avails
 

general

 

reasoning

 
pleasure
 
Leontium
 

relations

 

considered

 
Themista
 
thinking

enjoyment

 

diversity

 

surprised

 

conducted

 
philosopher
 
points
 
perceived
 

treated

 
subjects
 

manner