FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101  
1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   >>   >|  
nce he spoke hard words to him, say a syllable which he need regret, but his deathbed seemed hardly less inaccessible than his life."--Mrs. James G. Blaine, _Letters_, Vol. 2, p. 203. Dated, San Remo, May 1, 1888. Addressed to Walker Blaine.] CHAPTER XXXVI CLEVELAND'S ENORMOUS MAJORITY 1881-2 While Conkling was being deposed, John Kelly, to whom responsibility attached for Hancock's defeat, also suffered the penalty of selfish leadership.[1772] Although his standard of official honesty had always been as low as his standard of official responsibility, it never aroused violent party opposition until his personal resentments brought Democratic defeat. This classified him at once as a common enemy. In vain did he protest as Tweed had done against being made a "scape-goat." His sentence was political death, and as a first step toward its execution, Mayor Cooper refused to reappoint him comptroller, an office which he had held for four years. Republican aldermen joined in confirming his successor. Similar treatment, accorded his office-holding associates, stripped him of patronage except in the office of register. [Footnote 1772: "He wantonly sacrificed the Hancock ticket to his unscrupulous quest of local power. The Democracy here and elsewhere perfectly understand his perfidy, and they only await an opportunity for a reckoning. They intend to punish him and make an example of him as a warning to bolting renegades and traitors."--New York _Herald_, November 5, 1880.] Then his Democratic opponents proposed depriving him of control in conventions, and having failed to reorganise him out of Tammany (April, 1881), they founded the County Democracy. William C. Whitney, corporation counsel, Hubert O. Thompson, the young commissioner of public works, and other leaders of similar character, heading a Committee of One Hundred, became its inspiration. Under the Tammany system twenty-four men constituted the Committee on Organisation, while a few persons at any Assembly primary might represent all the votes of the district. The new organisation proposed to make its Committee on Organisation consist of six hundred and seventy-eight members and to place the control of all nominations in the hands of the people. It was a catchy scheme and quickly became popular. To carry it into effect a public enrolment was made of the Democratic voters in each election district, who had an opportunity, by registering their names
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086   1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101  
1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   1112   1113   1114   1115   1116   1117   1118   1119   1120   1121   1122   1123   1124   1125   1126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
office
 
Committee
 
Democratic
 

standard

 
Tammany
 

official

 
proposed
 
Hancock
 

defeat

 

Democracy


control

 
Organisation
 

responsibility

 

district

 

Blaine

 
public
 

opportunity

 

corporation

 

counsel

 

Hubert


failed

 

founded

 

William

 

Whitney

 

reorganise

 

County

 

depriving

 

bolting

 
warning
 
renegades

perfidy

 
traitors
 

reckoning

 

intend

 

punish

 

perfectly

 

opponents

 

conventions

 

Herald

 

November


understand

 
people
 

catchy

 

quickly

 

scheme

 
nominations
 
hundred
 

seventy

 

members

 
popular