by the Earl, who appears to have entertained considerable
opinion of his skill. When the Insurrection of 1715 broke out, it would
have been consistent with the character of a "brave and generous man" to
have left this humble practitioner free to follow his own wishes, and
not to have embroiled him in the dangers of that disastrous undertaking.
A further claim upon the Earl's forbearance was the personal defect of
the poor surgeon, who was lame, and short in stature. He was
nevertheless ordered to meet Lord Southesk, at a certain place of
rendezvous, on a certain day. A compliance was expected as a matter of
course, for James Carnegie was a yearly pensioner of his noble and
powerful brother, and refusal was ruin.[237] Nevertheless, the surgeon
ventured on this occasion to judge for himself. He had, it appears, from
his subsequent declaration, been ever well affected to the reigning
Government and attached to the Revolution interest and, by his
disapprobation of the Insurrection of 1715, had given umbrage to his
nearest relations. Upon the command of Lord Southesk being issued to
follow him to the camp at Perth, Carnegie would have fled and hidden
himself but for the illness of his wife; he afterwards took refuge in
the house of Lord Northesk, but his seclusion was of no avail. The
following letter from Lord Southesk, the original of which is in the
State Paper Office, affords a curious insight into the despotism
exercised by the little kings of the Highlands over their subjects:--
"James,--
"After what I both wrote and spoke to you, I did not think you would
have made any furder difficultys of going to Perth with me. I know
very well your wife's circumstances are to be pityd; however, since
you have a pension from me, and served me since you have had any
business, there is nobody of your employment in this country that I
can put any confidence in, whatever may happen to me. Therefore I
desire you may make no furder excuses; and if you can't be ready to
wait upon me from Kinnaird upon Monday, I desire you may follow me
upon Teusday; if you do not, you will for ever disoblige
"SOUTHESQUE."
"Kinnaird, Sept. 17, 1715."
"I desire you may come and speak with me this night, or to-morrow,
at furdest."
"The Case of James Carnegie," also in the State Paper Office, furnishes
a supplement to this peremptory summon
|