FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579  
1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   1588   1589   1590   1591   1592   1593   1594   1595   1596   1597   1598   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   >>   >|  
o explain the alterations in the present bill, which alterations regarded the manner of carrying into effect principles already adopted by the house. These principles consisted in the disfranchisement of decayed and inconsiderable boroughs; the enfranchisement of large and opulent towns; and the introduction of a general new electoral qualification. As regards the disfranchisement of decayed boroughs, the former bill had taken the census of 1821 as the rule, and had fixed on a certain amount of population, disfranchising all those whose population did not at that time reach the amount. Since that time a new census had been taken. This census could not be thrown out of view, but, at the same time, it was liable to objection, having been taken after a particular point of population had been fixed as that of disfranchisement, it was not improbable that pains had been taken to raise certain boroughs above the line of disfranchisement. Ministers had, therefore, rather taken the number of houses than that of inhabitants, it being less likely that improper practices would be adopted in regard to the former than to the latter. It had been found difficult, he continued, to draw a line which should mark where the census should be attended to, and where it was to be disregarded. Ministers had used every effort to obtain a correct account of the size and importance of the boroughs which were to be abolished; and on the data they had obtained schedule A of the new bill was to be founded. The drawing of the line at which disfranchisement should stop, he said, must necessarily be arbitrary, whether the population, the houses, or the amount of the assessed taxes, or the number of boroughs, was to be taken into consideration. It had appeared to ministers that the number which had been fixed last session to be disfranchised was proper, and therefore they proposed to strike off fifty-six, the number which stood in schedule A of the former bill. The consequence of this was that some of the boroughs which formerly escaped disfranchisement in consequence of the population of their parishes being large, though the boroughs themselves were inconsiderable, would now be placed in schedule A, whilst others would be raised out of it, and placed in schedule B. Another part of the disfranchising clauses of the bill regarded the boroughs in schedule B, which were to be deprived of only one of their two members. Ministers had now resolved to give an ad
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1555   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568   1569   1570   1571   1572   1573   1574   1575   1576   1577   1578   1579  
1580   1581   1582   1583   1584   1585   1586   1587   1588   1589   1590   1591   1592   1593   1594   1595   1596   1597   1598   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

boroughs

 

disfranchisement

 
population
 

schedule

 

census

 

number

 

Ministers

 

amount

 

alterations

 

consequence


regarded

 
disfranchising
 
houses
 

inconsiderable

 
principles
 
adopted
 

decayed

 

drawing

 

arbitrary

 

members


necessarily

 

abolished

 

importance

 

account

 

resolved

 

deprived

 

obtained

 

founded

 

assessed

 
raised

correct

 

escaped

 
whilst
 

parishes

 

consideration

 
appeared
 

Another

 
ministers
 

proposed

 
strike

proper

 

disfranchised

 

session

 
clauses
 

carrying

 

manner

 
thrown
 

opulent

 

enfranchisement

 
introduction