FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379  
1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   >>   >|  
topic in the speech was an allusion to the late naval conflict. It remarked:--"Having been earnestly entreated by the Greeks to interpose his good offices, with a view to effect a reconciliation between them and the Porte, his majesty concerted measures in the first instance with the Emperor of Russia, and subsequently with his imperial majesty and the King of France. His majesty has given directions that there should be laid before you copies of a protocol signed at St. Petersburg by the plenipotentiaries of his majesty, and of his imperial majesty the Emperor of Russia, on the 4th of April, 1826, and of the treaty entered into between his majesty and the courts of the Tuilleries and of St Petersburg, on the 6th of July, 1827. In the course of the measures adopted 'with a view to carry into effect the object of the treaty a collision wholly unexpected by his majesty took place in the port of Navarino between the fleets of the contracting powers. Notwithstanding the valour displayed by the combined fleet, his majesty deeply laments that this conflict should have occurred with the naval force of our ancient ally; but he still entertains a confident hope that this untoward event will not be followed by further hostilities, and will not impede that amicable adjustment of the existing differences between the Porte and the Greeks to which it is so manifestly their common interests to accede." This is the first time in the British annals that a victory is characterized as an "untoward event." But the men now in power hated Greece and her cause, and were so blinded by admiration of despotic principles, as not to perceive the advantages which might accrue to Russia in her future projects, from the destruction of the Ottoman navy, and from the lack of confidence which the sultan would now have in his western allies. In both houses the language of the king's speech respecting the victory of Navarino was loudly denounced by opposition, it being supposed to indicate that the Duke of Wellington's cabinet abandoned the line of Mr. Canning's policy. In the lords the Duke of Richmond especially fixed a quarrel on the phrase "ancient ally:" contending that the sultan could not be termed in any correct sense of the word an ally of this country at all, and much less an "ancient ally." He disapproved still more of the epithet "untoward," as applied in the speech to the battle of Navarino. If the term was meant, he said, to cast any blame on
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   1365   1366   1367   1368   1369   1370   1371   1372   1373   1374   1375   1376   1377   1378   1379  
1380   1381   1382   1383   1384   1385   1386   1387   1388   1389   1390   1391   1392   1393   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

majesty

 

ancient

 
untoward
 

speech

 

Russia

 

Navarino

 

Petersburg

 

imperial

 

treaty

 

victory


sultan

 
effect
 
Greeks
 

Emperor

 
measures
 
conflict
 

Ottoman

 

confidence

 

future

 

destruction


western

 

projects

 

Greece

 

annals

 

characterized

 

blinded

 

advantages

 

perceive

 

principles

 
admiration

despotic

 

accrue

 
country
 

contending

 

termed

 
correct
 

disapproved

 
epithet
 

applied

 
battle

phrase

 

quarrel

 

denounced

 
opposition
 

supposed

 

loudly

 
respecting
 

houses

 

language

 
Wellington