FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195  
1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   >>   >|  
ed for a fortnight, to give time for all the petitions recently received from persons who had been imprisoned to be brought up. This amendment, however, was negatived, as was another on the third reading of the bill, the object of which was to do away with it altogether. When introduced in the commons on the 10th of March, it was strongly opposed by Sir Samuel Romilly, who contended that it was improperly called a bill of indemnity. The object of indemnity, he said, was only to protect individuals against public prosecution, without interfering with the rights of private men; but the object of the bill was to annihilate all such rights, to take away all legal remedies from those who had suffered an illegal and arbitrary exercise of authority, and to punish those who presumed to have recourse to such remedies by subjecting them to the payment of double costs. Mr. Lambton moved an amendment that it be read again that day six months, but this was lost by one hundred and ninety to sixty-four. The bill was read a second time on the next day, but the chief discussion took place on the order for committing it, when several petitions, complaining of grievous oppression, were presented to the house: the bill, however, passed on the 13th, and four days after received the royal assent. EXTENSION OF THE BANK RESTRICTION. At an early period of the session, Mr. Grenfell inquired of the chancellor of the exchequer whether any event had occurred, or was likely to occur, which would prevent the resumption of cash-payments by the Bank in July. He observed that the public stood in the situation of debtor to the bank for L3,000,000 advanced without interest, and for L6,000,000 at an interest of four per cent; but as the Bank had secured possession of public money deposited in their hands, which for the last twelve years had amounted on an average to L11,000,000 for the repayment of these sums, he asked whether any arrangement was made for discharging, or placing them on a better footing. In reply, the chancellor of the exchequer stated, that the Bank had made ample preparation for resuming cash-payments at the time fixed by parliament, but that pecuniary transactions were going on with foreign powers which might probably require an extension of the restriction: as regards the loan of L6,000,000, he said, he should shortly submit a proposal for its repayment, allowing the country still to enjoy the benefit of that on which no inte
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195  
1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

public

 

object

 
remedies
 

rights

 

indemnity

 

exchequer

 

repayment

 
payments
 

interest

 

chancellor


amendment

 

received

 

petitions

 

debtor

 
observed
 

situation

 

allowing

 

advanced

 

secured

 

submit


proposal

 

benefit

 
inquired
 
Grenfell
 
period
 

session

 
occurred
 

resumption

 
shortly
 
country

prevent
 

possession

 
foreign
 
footing
 

placing

 

powers

 
discharging
 
preparation
 

parliament

 
pecuniary

stated

 

transactions

 

arrangement

 

require

 

twelve

 

deposited

 
amounted
 

average

 
extension
 

restriction