FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910  
911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   >>   >|  
nto the State of the Nation rejected..... Marriage of the Prince of Wales..... Parliament Prorogued..... The Affairs of Ireland..... Naval Affairs in the Mediterranean, &c...... French Operations in Holland, &c...... Treaties between France and Prussia, &c..... Treaty between England and Russia, &c..... The Campaign of the Alps..... Affairs of La Vendee..... Armies on the Rhine..... Affairs at Paris..... Meeting of Parliament..... Bill to prevent Seditious Meetings, &c. {A.D. 1795} BILL FOR THE SUSPENSION OF THE HABEAS CORPUS ACT (CONTINUED.) On the 5th of January, Sheridan rose to move for leave to bring in a bill for the repeal of the suspension of the Habeas Corpus act. This motion was unsuccessful; and on the 15th the attorney-general moved for, and obtained leave to bring in a bill for continuing the suspension for a limited time. The second reading of this bill was carried on the 23rd, after a long debate, by a majority of two hundred and thirty-nine against fifty-three, when it was transmitted to the lords. It passed the house of peers without a division; but the Dukes of Norfolk and Bedford, the Marquis of Lansdowne, and the Earls of Lauderdale and Guildford entered a spirited protest against the measure. It was argued by the opposition that the preamble of the suspension act, which stated that a dangerous conspiracy existed in the country, was not true; that a verdict in court--on the trial of Walker, Hardy, Home Tooke, and others--had shown this conspiracy to be a fabrication; and that, as no treason had been brought to light, and the alleged ground of the suspension act did not exist, if was unnecessary. On the other hand it was argued, that the determination of the jury was no proof of the existence of a conspiracy; that the guilty were often acquitted in courts of justice, not because they were innocent, or considered innocent, but merely because there was no strictly legal evidence to confirm the truth; and that, therefore, a verdict in their favour could not operate as a motive for repealing the act, even if it were admitted that their indictment for high treason had not been supported by legal proof. SUBSIDY TO AUSTRIA. Early in this year it became evident that, besides the United Provinces, both Prussia and Spain were on the point of breaking with the coalition, and concluding separate treaties with France: Prussia, from the mutual distrus
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910  
911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Affairs

 

suspension

 
Prussia
 

conspiracy

 

innocent

 

treason

 

verdict

 
argued
 

Parliament

 

France


breaking

 

favour

 

fabrication

 

alleged

 
brought
 

United

 

Provinces

 

coalition

 

stated

 

dangerous


preamble

 

distrus

 
opposition
 
mutual
 
existed
 

country

 
Walker
 

concluding

 
treaties
 
separate

ground
 

indictment

 
measure
 
justice
 

SUBSIDY

 

supported

 
admitted
 
considered
 

repealing

 
confirm

evidence

 

strictly

 

AUSTRIA

 

determination

 

motive

 

operate

 
unnecessary
 

existence

 
evident
 

acquitted