FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
s could be obtained. Hence it was concluded that the most of the work was done on the shell of the boiler." In no other way can I give the members of the Iron and Steel Institute so much information in regard to this new fuel as by including in this paper a very able communication from the chief chemist at our Edgar Thomson Steel Works, Mr. S.A. Ford, who is to-day the highest authority upon the subject: "So much has been claimed for natural gas as regards the superiority of its heating properties as compared with coal, that some analyses of this gas, together with calculations showing the comparison between its heating power and that of coal, may be of interest. These calculations are, of course, theoretical in both cases, and it must not be imagined that the total amount of heat, either in a ton of coal or 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas, can ever be fully utilized. In making these calculations I employed as a basis what in my estimation was a gas of an average chemical composition, as I have found that gas from the same well varies continually in its composition. Thus, samples of gas from the same well, but taken on different days, vary in nitrogen from 23 per cent. to _nil_, carbonic acid from 2 per cent. to _nil_, oxygen from 4 per cent, to 0.4 per cent., and so with all the component gases. Before giving the theoretical heating power of 1,000 cubic feet of this gas I will note a few analyses. The first four are of gas from the same well; samples taken on the same day that they were analyzed. The two last are from two different wells in the East Liberty district: ANALYSES OF NATURAL GAS. --------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | --------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ When tested.........|10-28-84|10-29-84|11-24-84|12-4-84 |10-18-84|10-25-84| | per ct.| per ct.| per ct.| per ct.| per ct.| per ct.| Carbonic acid ......| 0.8 | 0.6 | Nil. | 0.4 | Nil. | 0.30| Carbonic oxide......| 1.0 | 0.8 | .58 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.30| Oxygen... ... ......| 1.1 | 0.8 | .78 | 0.8 | 2.10| 1.20| Olefiant gas .......| 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.98| 0.6 | 0.80| 0.6 | Ethylic hydride ....| 3.6 | 5.5 | 7.92| 12.30 | 5.20| 4.8 | Marsh gas ..........| 72.18| 65.25| 60.70|
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
calculations
 

heating

 

analyses

 

theoretical

 
composition
 
natural
 

samples

 
Carbonic
 

Before

 

varies


nitrogen

 

continually

 
giving
 

oxygen

 
component
 
carbonic
 

ANALYSES

 

Oxygen

 
Olefiant
 

Ethylic


hydride

 

tested

 

analyzed

 
NATURAL
 

chemical

 
Liberty
 

district

 

communication

 

chemist

 

including


highest

 

Thomson

 
concluded
 

obtained

 

boiler

 

Institute

 
information
 
regard
 

members

 

authority


amount

 

imagined

 

estimation

 

employed

 
utilized
 

making

 
superiority
 

properties

 
claimed
 

subject