FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038  
1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   >>   >|  
halepotaton Apasi d' argalea 'stin, ouk emoi mono, Tio polu mallon thugatri.--pragm' amachon legeis' Eu oida-- In the Latin edition of Caecilius, this conversation, so elegant in its simplicity, is converted into the following uncouth dialogue:-- -Sed tua morosane uxor quaeso est?--Ua! rogas?-- Qui tandem?--Taedet rientionis, quae mihi Ubi domum adveni ac sedi, extemplo savium Dat jejuna anima.--Nil peccat de savio: Ut devomas volt, quod foris polaveris.- 26. Even when the Romans built stone theatres, these had not the sounding-apparatus by which the Greek architects supported the efforts of the actors (Vitruv. v. 5, 8). 27. III. XIII. Increase of Amusements 28. The personal notices of Naevius are sadly confused. Seeing that he fought in the first Punic war, he cannot have been born later than 495. Dramas, probably the first, were exhibited by him in 519 (Gell. xii. 21. 45). That he had died as early as 550, as is usually stated, was doubted by Varro (ap. Cic. Brut. 15, 60), and certainly with reason; if it were true, he must have made his escape during the Hannibalic war to the soil of the enemy. The sarcastic verses on Scipio (p. 150) cannot have been written before the battle of Zama. We may place his life between 490 and 560, so that he was a contemporary of the two Scipios who fell in 543 (Cic. de Rep. iv. 10), ten years younger than Andronicus, and perhaps ten years older than Plautus. His Campanian origin is indicated by Gellius, and his Latin nationality, if proof of it were needed, by himself in his epitaph. The hypothesis that he was not a Roman citizen, but possibly a burgess of Cales or of some other Latin town in Campania, renders the fact that the Roman police treated him so unscrupulously the more easy of explanation. At any rate he was not an actor, for he served in the army. 29. Compare, e. g., with the verse of Livius the fragment from Naevius' tragedy of -Lycurgus- :-- -Vos, qui regalis cordons custodias Agitatis, ite actutum in frundiferos locos, Ingenio arbusta ubi nata sunt, non obsita-; Or the famous words, which in the -Hector Profisciscens- Hector addresses to Priam: -Laetus sum laudari me abs te, pater, a laudato viro;- and the charming verse from the -Tarentilla-; -- -Alii adnutat, alii adnictat; alium amat, alium tenet.- 30. III. XIV. Political Neutrality 31. III. XIV. Political Neutrality 32. This hypothesis appears necessary, because otherwis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038  
1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hector

 

Naevius

 
hypothesis
 

Political

 

Neutrality

 

epitaph

 

needed

 
burgess
 

battle

 

possibly


written

 

citizen

 

younger

 

Andronicus

 
Scipios
 

Plautus

 

nationality

 

Gellius

 

origin

 

contemporary


Campanian

 

explanation

 
Laetus
 
laudari
 
addresses
 

Profisciscens

 
obsita
 

famous

 
laudato
 
appears

otherwis
 

Tarentilla

 
charming
 
adnutat
 

adnictat

 

arbusta

 
served
 
Scipio
 

police

 
renders

treated

 

unscrupulously

 

Compare

 

Agitatis

 

custodias

 

actutum

 
frundiferos
 

Ingenio

 
cordons
 

regalis