FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162  
163   164   165   166   167   >>  
to form the introductory sections of an incantation; but in all of them Enki, the god of the deep water, plays the leading part, though associated with different consorts.(1) The incantation is directed against various diseases, and the recitation of the closing mythical section was evidently intended to enlist the aid of special gods in combating them. The creation of these deities is recited under set formulae in a sort of refrain, and the divine name assigned to each bears a magical connexion with the sickness he or she is intended to dispel.(2) (1) See Langdon, Univ. of Penns. Mus. Publ., Bab. Sect., Vol. X, No. 1 (1915), pl. i f., pp. 69 ff.; _Journ. Amer. Or. Soc._, Vol. XXXVI (1916), pp. 140 ff.; cf. Prince, _Journ. Amer. Or. Soc._, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 90 ff.; Jastrow, _Journ. Amer. Or. Soc._, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 122 ff., and in particular his detailed study of the text in _Amer. Journ. Semit. Lang._, Vol. XXXIII, pp. 91 ff. Dr. Langdon's first description of the text, in _Proc. Soc. Bibl. Arch._, Vol. XXXVI (1914), pp. 188 ff., was based on a comparatively small fragment only; and on his completion of the text from other fragments in Pennsylvania. Professor Sayce at once realized that the preliminary diagnosis of a Deluge myth could not be sustained (cf. _Expos. Times_, Nov., 1915, pp. 88 ff.). He, Professor Prince, and Professor Jastrow independently showed that the action of Enki in the myth in sending water on the land was not punitive but beneficent; and the preceding section, in which animals are described as not performing their usual activities, was shown independently by Professor Prince and Professor Jastrow to have reference, not to their different nature in an ideal existence in Paradise, but, on familiar lines, to their non- existence in a desolate land. It may be added that Professor Barton and Dr. Peters agree generally with Professor Prince and Professor Jastrow in their interpretation of the text, which excludes the suggested biblical parallels; and I understand from Dr. Langdon that he very rightly recognizes that the text is not a Deluge myth. It is a subject for congratulation that the discussion has materially increased our knowledge of this difficult composition. (2) Cf. Col. VI, ll. 24 ff.; thus _Ab_-u was created for the sickness of the co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162  
163   164   165   166   167   >>  



Top keywords:
Professor
 
Prince
 
Jastrow
 

Langdon

 
existence
 

sickness

 
Deluge
 
independently
 

intended

 

incantation


section

 
showed
 

punitive

 

action

 

sending

 
preceding
 

difficult

 

animals

 

composition

 

beneficent


preliminary

 

diagnosis

 

created

 

realized

 

sustained

 

increased

 

Barton

 

Peters

 
recognizes
 
desolate

subject

 
generally
 

parallels

 

understand

 

biblical

 

suggested

 

rightly

 

interpretation

 

excludes

 

familiar


performing

 
discussion
 

materially

 

activities

 

congratulation

 
Paradise
 
nature
 

reference

 

knowledge

 
deities