FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  
ever, R. L. S. Copied it myself. TO THOMAS STEVENSON _La Solitude, Hyeres, April 19, 1884._ MY DEAR FATHER,--Yesterday I very powerfully stated the _Haeresis Stevensoniana_, or the complete body of divinity of the family theologian, to Miss Ferrier. She was much impressed; so was I. You are a great heresiarch; and I know no better. Whaur the devil did ye get thon about the soap? Is it altogether your own? I never heard it elsewhere; and yet I suspect it must have been held at some time or other, and if you were to look up you would probably find yourself condemned by some Council. I am glad to hear you are so well. The hear is excellent. The Cornhills came; I made Miss Ferrier read us _Thrawn Janet_, and was quite bowled over by my own works. _The Merry Men_ I mean to make much longer, with a whole new denouement, not yet quite clear to me. _The Story of a Lie_ I must rewrite entirely also, as it is too weak and ragged, yet is worth saving for the Admiral. Did I ever tell you that the Admiral was recognised in America? When they are all on their legs this will make an excellent collection. Has Davie never read _Guy Mannering_, _Rob Roy_, or _The Antiquary_? All of which are worth three _Waverleys_. I think _Kenilworth_ better than _Waverley_; _Nigel_, too; and _Quentin Durward_ about as good. But it shows a true piece of insight to prefer _Waverley_, for it _is_ different; and though not quite coherent, better worked in parts than almost any other: surely more carefully. It is undeniable that the love of the slap-dash and the shoddy grew upon Scott with success. Perhaps it does on many of us, which may be the granite on which D.'s opinion stands. However, I hold it, in Patrick Walker's phrase, for an "old, condemned, damnable error." Dr. Simson was condemned by P. W. as being "a bagful of" such. One of Patrick's amenities! Another ground there may be to D.'s opinion; those who avoid (or seek to avoid) Scott's facility are apt to be continually straining and torturing their style to get in more of life. And to many the extra significance does not redeem the strain. DOCTOR STEVENSON. TO W. E. HENLEY _La Solitude, Hyeres, April 20th, 1884._ I have been really ill for two days, hemorrhage, weakness, extreme nervousness that will not let me lie a moment, and damned sciatica o' nights; but to-day I am on the recovery. Time; for I was miserable. It is not oft
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95  
96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

condemned

 

excellent

 

Patrick

 

opinion

 

Waverley

 

Admiral

 

Ferrier

 
Solitude
 

Hyeres

 

STEVENSON


insight

 

prefer

 

granite

 

Quentin

 

stands

 

Durward

 
success
 

surely

 

carefully

 

However


undeniable

 

Perhaps

 

coherent

 

shoddy

 

worked

 

hemorrhage

 
extreme
 

weakness

 

strain

 

redeem


DOCTOR

 

HENLEY

 

nervousness

 

recovery

 

miserable

 

nights

 

moment

 

damned

 
sciatica
 

significance


bagful
 
amenities
 

Simson

 
phrase
 

Walker

 
damnable
 

Another

 

ground

 

torturing

 

straining