FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146  
147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>   >|  
t the unthrifty quite as much as the thrifty. But if the promised doubling of wages should not take place, what will happen? The Socialist agitators will explain that they are sorry to have made a mistake, whilst the thriftless are squandering the property of the thrifty. According to the Socialist teachings, the capitalist is a perfectly useless being in the national household. "Does he himself want to work: to do something useful? Far from it. His money works for him; his money makes money, as the saying is."[448] Most capitalists--and I think the large majority of wage-earners are capitalists to some extent--are engaged in useful productive work of hand or brain. However, the capitalist of the Socialist imagination, the wealthy man who lives without any work, who studies the money market and Stock Exchange quotations, and who is occupied solely in investing and reinvesting his money to the best advantage, is an extremely useful member of society. It is of the utmost consequence to all workers, and to the whole nation, that the national capital should grow, that mines, railways, ships, machinery, houses, &c., should multiply and be constantly improved. Now the thrifty, not the wasteful, preserve and increase the national capital. Wise and cautious capitalists in enriching themselves will enrich the nation. Careless ones will lose their money and impoverish the nation. The wealth of France has, to a very large extent, been created by cautious and far-seeing _rentiers_, and thus France has become the banker among nations. Socialists teach that the wealth of the few causes the poverty of the many; that therefore the private capitalist should be destroyed. Why, then, are the workers most prosperous in those countries which possess the wealthiest capitalists, such as France and the United States, and why are they poorest in countries, such as Turkey and Servia, where wealthy capitalists do not exist? And may not the destruction of the capitalists reduce Great Britain to the level of Turkey and Servia? FOOTNOTES: [430] _Socialism Made Plain_, p. 9. [431] _Capital and Land_, pp. 5, 6. [432] Kautsky, _The Social Revolution_, p. 11. [433] Blatchford, _The Clarion Ballads_, p. 9. [434] Blatchford, _The Pope's Socialism_, p. 2. [435] Bax and Quelch, _A New Catechism of Socialism_, p. 17. [436] Sorge, _Socialism and the Worker_, p. 11. [437] Keir Hardie, _From Serfdom to Socialism_, p. 11. [438] Joynes,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146  
147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
capitalists
 

Socialism

 

national

 
nation
 
capitalist
 
Socialist
 

thrifty

 

France

 

wealth

 

cautious


Servia
 
Turkey
 

wealthy

 

extent

 

countries

 

capital

 

Blatchford

 

workers

 

Careless

 

prosperous


possess
 

created

 

United

 
rentiers
 

wealthiest

 
enrich
 
poverty
 

Socialists

 

nations

 

banker


impoverish

 

destroyed

 
States
 
private
 

Quelch

 
Clarion
 

Ballads

 

Catechism

 

Serfdom

 

Joynes


Hardie

 

Worker

 
Revolution
 

reduce

 
Britain
 
FOOTNOTES
 

destruction

 

poorest

 
Kautsky
 

Social