ges of its growth, when the roots
require the soil to be pulverized to a considerable depth.
The _cultivator_ may be considered an _improved harrow_. The principal
difference between them being, that while the teeth of the harrow are
pointed at the lower end, those of the cultivator are shaped like a
small double plow, being large at the bottom and growing smaller
towards the top. They lift the earth up, instead of pressing it
downwards, thus loosening instead of compacting the soil.
Many styles of cultivators are now sold at agricultural warehouses. A
very good one, for field use, may be made by substituting the cultivator
teeth for the spikes in an old harrow frame.
CHAPTER VI.
ROLLING, MULCHING, WEEDING, ETC.
ROLLING.
[Name some of the benefits of rolling?]
_Rolling_ the soil with a large roller, arranged to be drawn by a team,
is in many instances a good accessory to cultivation. By its means, the
following results are obtained:--
1. The soil at the surface is pulverized without the compacting of the
lower parts, the area of contact being large.
2. The stones on the land are pressed down so as to be out of the way of
the scythe in mowing.
3. The soil is compacted around seeds after sowing in such a manner as
to exclude light and to _touch_ them in every part, both of which are
essential to their germination and to the healthfulness of the plants.
[Under what circumstances should the roller be used?]
4. The soil is so compacted at the surface, that it is less frequented
by _grubs_, etc., than when it is more loose.
5. When the soil is smoothed in this manner, there is less surface
exposed for the evaporation of water with its cooling effect.
6. Light sandy lands, by being rolled in the fall, are rendered more
compact, and the loosening effects of frequent freezing and thawing are
avoided.
Although productive of these various effects, rolling should be adopted
only with much care, and should never be applied to very heavy lands,
except in dry weather when lumpy after plowing, as its tendency in such
cases would be to render them still more difficult of cultivation. Soils
in which air does not circulate freely, are not improved by rolling, as
it presses the surface-particles still more closely together, and
prevents the free admission of the atmosphere.
If well _under-drained_, a large majority of soils would doubtless be
benefited by a judicious use of the roller.[AL]
M
|